Re: RFC: proposal for indirect deplibs

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > It may be that they fixed it, but didn't add appropriate NEEDEDs to some
> > of their shipped libraries.  We'll need to take this into account if
> > that's the case.
>
> Actually, I don't have a clue about Solaris, I merely thought I saw a
> statement to that extent somewhere.  I'll go and check.

That statement was from me, and is unsubstantiated/unverified so it is 
likely to be wrong.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen