Re: libtoolize

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Patrick Welche wrote:

> As to where the point the finger, I would say "libtoolize" as it doesn't
> seem to be copying the .m4's from libtool-2.1a/m4, assuming that is what
> it is still meant to do..

I am pretty sure that Gary backed out support for the libtool 
version-specific m4 directory.  That would mean that your 
libtool-2.1a/m4 directory is now an orphan and should be manually 
removed.  It is quite possible that inconsistencies remain (as you 
pointed out earlier).

I recommend discussing issues with unreleased libtool versions on the 
libtool-patches list since otherwise the discussions are confusing for 
those using a released libtool.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen