[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -DPIC - redundant?
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: -DPIC - redundant? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:21:24 -0600 (CST) |
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
Apologies if this is a stupid question, but please could someone
explain to me why libtool sets '-DPIC' for shared libraries, while
gcc reliably defines '__PIC__' when it generates PIC code?
Setting '-DPIC' encourages people to do '#ifdef PIC' when surely
'#ifdef __PIC__' would be more reliable.
Libtool supports plenty more compilers than just gcc.
I recall from discussions a couple of years ago that this define is
even used from within some Fortran code.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen