[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool...
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool... |
Date: |
Sat, 14 May 2005 08:42:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:28:10AM -0600, Ed Hartnett wrote:
> In the case of shared library versions, what about the header file?
>
> Most libraries (including the one I am converting to libtool) have a
> header file that is installed along with the library.
>
> Although the versioning scheme is very clever about letting me have
> multiple libraries of different major versions, is there any
> equivalent way to handle the header files of different versions?
Take a look at the way glib handles this. The encode the ABI in the
library name and the path to the include files.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., (continued)
- Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Ed Hartnett, 2005/05/13
- Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/05/13
- Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Ed Hartnett, 2005/05/13
- Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Daniel Reed, 2005/05/13
- Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Daniel Reed, 2005/05/13
- Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Ed Hartnett, 2005/05/13
- Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/05/13
- Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Daniel Reed, 2005/05/13
- Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Daniel Reed, 2005/05/13
Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Ed Hartnett, 2005/05/14
Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Bill Northcott, 2005/05/13
Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool..., Bill Northcott, 2005/05/13