Re: solaris 10: address@hidden

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi David,

Sorry for the late response.

* David Lee wrote on Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:08:55PM CEST:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, David Lee wrote:
> 
> >For instance, do we _know_ that this S10/address@hidden problem is 
> >_definitely_ 100% attributable to GNU/ld?
*snip*
> There is apparently a fix for GNU/ld in the last day or so.  See:
>    http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1031
> 
> I hope to try this fix, by Eric Botcazou, for myself next week (also 
> checking that it doesn't break things on S8 or S9).  Meanwhile, other folk 
> here also might wish to try it and report back (positively or negatively) 
> at that bugzilla location.

Thanks a lot for posting this here!  IMHO it is sufficient to have
people either
- upgrade their GNU ld to fix this,
- use the system ld, or
- temporarily mess with build_libtool_need_lc in `libtool' to work
  around this issue,

no need to have Libtool work around this GNU ld bug.  Does anyone
oppose?

Cheers,
Ralf