[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:56:31 +0100 |
Hallo Ralf,
On 22 Aug 2005, at 21:00, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Furthermore, it has at least this serious bug in its new
functionality:
- using libltdl but not as subpackage does not work as advertised
(this bug is in part a documentation bug -- LTDL_INIT needs to be
suitably documented -- but also the AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS call from
LT_WITH_LTDL needs to be made configurable)
Hmm... I'll look into this when --patch-23 is resolved.
This concern was just because cvs diff hadn't picked up all of --
patch-23
right? Everything seems to work fine here...
Regardless, LTDL_INIT is not documented at the moment, and I'm not
sure we
want to explicitly support use of libltdl except as a subpackage.
Although
it has been possible to do so for quite some time (if only because
libtool
itself has done so on and off over the last few years), we have never
really *designed* an interface for it. Post-2.0, we can always firm up a
long term interface, document it and *then* make a commitment to support
that interface in the future.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. gary@
{lilith.warpmail.net,gnu.org},address@hidden
Research Scientist ( '/ http://www.tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4}
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Noah Misch, 2005/08/22
Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2005/08/22