|
From: | Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: | Re: argz.m4 showstopper? |
Date: | Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:31:01 +0100 |
Hallo Ralf, On 29 Aug 2005, at 07:43, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:47:54AM CEST:Currently http://tkd.kicks-ass.net/GnuLibtoolProject/Roadmap says: <!> Does the client need argz.m4? Only if libtoolize --ltdl? Is this just that argz.m4 is always added to a client by libtoolize, but sometimes might not be needed?Well, it's needed exactly when ltdl.m4 is needed.If so, I move to strike it as a showstopper, and worry about it post-2.0.Shouldn't this be very easy to fix?
Oh, no doubt. It's not a showstopper for the release though! Cheers, Gary.-- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. gary@ {lilith.warpmail.net,gnu.org},address@hidden
Research Scientist ( '/ http://www.tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4} Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |