[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use of modules, static vs shared, and dependencies
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: use of modules, static vs shared, and dependencies |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:36:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050305) |
Hi Howard,
Hope you don't mind my chiming in here... mostly for the benefit
of the archives, and lurkers:
Howard Chu wrote:
why should we
go through the module-handling work for something that is statically
linked into the main executable...
You only have to write the module calling code once in the parent
project. It accesses all the modules through the lt_dlopen APIs,
and doesn't care whether the person who built the project wanted to
have dso modules or preload all the modules into the same address
space (or some of each).
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature