[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reducing dependency_libs to what was on the command line.
From: |
Jacob Meuser |
Subject: |
Re: Reducing dependency_libs to what was on the command line. |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:10:25 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2i |
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 06:46:16PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jacob Meuser wrote on Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:43:05AM CET:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:25:15AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > > - or, and that is more important, where a lot of the installed
> > > libraries simply were never created with libtool, e.g., because
> > > they stem from a proprietary OS.
> >
> > or from BSD ...
>
> Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't mean to put BSD in the latter set.
no need to apologize, I didn't take it that way. I just wanted to
point out a situation that maybe(?) more people care about :)
--
<address@hidden>
- Reducing dependency_libs to what was on the command line., Kurt Roeckx, 2005/12/04
- Re: Reducing dependency_libs to what was on the command line., Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/12/05
- Re: Reducing dependency_libs to what was on the command line., Kurt Roeckx, 2005/12/06
- Re: Reducing dependency_libs to what was on the command line., Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/12/07
- Re: Reducing dependency_libs to what was on the command line., Kurt Roeckx, 2005/12/07
- Re: Reducing dependency_libs to what was on the command line., Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/12/15