[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:29:40 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:47:51AM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>- Should the corresponding libtool flags be named `-Bstatic' resp.
> >> `-Bdynamic'? Those were the most common names I could find, but IMHO
> >> they are not very self-explanatory for users not used to them.
> >
> >-prefer-static, -prefer-dynamic/-prefer-shared? The -Bxxx doesn't seem
> >similar with current libtool options.
>
> At least for the static case, I would prefer the link to entirely fail
> if a static library is requested but one can not be found. Usually
> there is a very important reason to use a static library if it has
> specifically been requested. So the wording should not be 'prefer'
> for the static case. I agree that the -B syntax does not fit the
> style of other libtool options (but does match many linkers).
Fine. -Bstatic on Linux means "Do not link against shared libraries."
anyway.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags, Bob Friesenhahn, 2006/02/01
- Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags,
Albert Chin <=
- Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags, Bob Friesenhahn, 2006/02/01
- Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags, Albert Chin, 2006/02/01
- Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags, Bob Friesenhahn, 2006/02/01
- Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/02
- Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags, Bob Friesenhahn, 2006/02/02
- Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/02/02
- Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/03
Re: per-deplib static/dynamic flags, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/02