[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exclusive static or shared
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: exclusive static or shared |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:47:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hi Christopher,
* Christopher Hulbert wrote on Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 12:28:59PM CET:
> On 2/15/06, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Here's a set of rules.
> >
> I guess I didn't make it clear enough that ALL the subdirectories were
> under the same configure script and doesn't make logical sense to
> split them.
Oh, you made that clear. You are not the only reader of this mailing
list, though, and I thought it to be appropriate to give a general
answer that is useful for more than one specific purpose.
> > Assuming a package that uses Automake, the developer can control this on
> > a per-library basis by putting
> > -static
> I had shared libraries enables and static disabled from configure. In
> passing -static to the 1 library I wanted to be static, it created
> the library, but without any object files in it. i.e. it was an empty
> library and thus resulted in missing symbols later.
Ahh! Now this may be a bug, I believe. I cannot reproduce this in a
test, though. Can you show me how to reproduce it? Which Libtool
version? How did you configure exactly? On what $host? config.log?
> and have created a patch for the PGI wl="" and -link -dll problem I
> was receiving. When I get to work I will test these and submit them
> to the libtool-patches list.
Well, some of the issues arise from the first MSVC patches: a couple of
times there was the assumption that on win32, non-gcc compiler meant
MSVC. You'd need to undo that. And then go and set the flags in
_LT_COMPILER_PIC correctly (for both CXX and other tags). And then you
can check all the other PORTME instances in libtool.m4 to see whether
they need adaptation, too. ;-)
Cheers,
Ralf
- exclusive static or shared, Christopher Hulbert, 2006/02/14
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/15
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Christopher Hulbert, 2006/02/15
- Re: exclusive static or shared,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Christopher Hulbert, 2006/02/15
- Message not available
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Christopher Hulbert, 2006/02/15
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/17
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Christopher Hulbert, 2006/02/17
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/17
- Re: exclusive static or shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/02/15