Re: Making shared libraries (DLLs) on Windows: -no-undefined

[Brian Dessent]

Bob Rossi wrote:

> Yup, I think this is the topic that I've been asking about. Not that I
> don't like it, but some of the users of a library I help maintain don't
> like it. I don't seem to have an easy way to make libtool just output
> the name of the dll with out the -<number>.

I don't see why you can't just use -avoid-version.

Brian