[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library
From: |
Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: |
Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:37:45 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) |
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I was just looking through the pic code evaluation in libtool.m4 and
> not getting real excited about recreating that.
In xserver's configure.ac you can, somewhere after AC_PROG_LIBTOOL, put
something like:
CC_PIC_FLAG="$lt_prog_compiler_pic"
CXX_PIC_FLAG="$lt_prog_compiler_pic_CXX"
AC_SUBST([CC_PIC_FLAG])
AC_SUBST([CXX_PIC_FLAG])
Then in the Makefile.am that descends into the mesa build, you can set
these vars as arguments to make (I guess you already set CC etc this
way?), and use them to build the pic objects.
I am pretty sure that you can similarly avoid the need for a fake
convenience .la, but can not work it out without actually attempting a
build :)
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
- Validity of "fake" convenience library, Dan Nicholson, 2008/03/03
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/03
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Dan Nicholson, 2008/03/03
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Daniel Herring, 2008/03/04
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Dan Nicholson, 2008/03/04
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/04
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Dan Nicholson, 2008/03/04
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library (libtool: to exclusive), Daniel Herring, 2008/03/04
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library (libtool: to exclusive), Dan Nicholson, 2008/03/04