[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library (libtool: to exclusive)
From: |
Dan Nicholson |
Subject: |
Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library (libtool: to exclusive) |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:54:48 -0800 |
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Herring <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Dan Nicholson - address@hidden wrote:
> > Do you know if there's any way for automake to ignore the "include"
> > keyword? I.e., I really want the "include" to be processed by make,
> > not automake. The only ugly way I could think of was to include a
> > dummy file that had the real includes.
>
> Something like the following works:
> DELAYDIR=.
> include $(DELAYDIR)/file.mk
> or
> DELAYINC=file.mk
> include $(DELAYINC)
>
> The trick being that automake stops at the variable substitution.
Of course! I was already doing that for some other tricks, but hadn't
thought about it in the context of include. Thanks.
--
Dan
- Validity of "fake" convenience library, Dan Nicholson, 2008/03/03
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/03
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Dan Nicholson, 2008/03/03
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Daniel Herring, 2008/03/04
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Dan Nicholson, 2008/03/04
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/04
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library, Dan Nicholson, 2008/03/04
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library (libtool: to exclusive), Daniel Herring, 2008/03/04
- Re: Validity of "fake" convenience library (libtool: to exclusive),
Dan Nicholson <=