Re: what's recommended if tests are failing?

[Gary V. Vaughan]

On 6 Mar 2008, at 10:29, snowcrash+libtool wrote:
> as they're both 'release versions' now, if 1.5x tests are passing
> 100%, but 2.2x is showing numerous failures, what's the general
> consensus on which to use?

2.2 has *much* better test coverage.  Probably, 1.5x would also fail
the better tests... and more of them than 2.2!

> 2.2x is 'ok', but the tests are problematic? or, drop back to stable  
> 15x?


Use 2.2 and report any failures you see in the new improved tests to
address@hidden, so that we can fix them in time for 2.2.2 next  
month.
:-)

Cheers,
        Gary
--
  ())_.              Email me: address@hidden
  ( '/           Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
  / )=         ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part