Re: what's recommended if tests are failing?

[snowcrash+libtool]

hi,

>  2.2 has *much* better test coverage.  Probably, 1.5x would also fail
>  the better tests... and more of them than 2.2!

that's a good point. thx.

>  > 2.2x is 'ok', but the tests are problematic? or, drop back to stable
>  > 15x?
>
>  Use 2.2

given the above pt, clear.

> and report any failures you see in the new improved tests to
>  address@hidden, so that we can fix them in time for 2.2.2 next
>  month.

already done the other day. pending ...  :-)