[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Customizing soname
From: |
Alon Bar-Lev |
Subject: |
Re: Customizing soname |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:22:50 +0200 |
On 3/27/08, Peter O'Gorman <address@hidden> wrote:
> Does automake complain if you do something like:
>
> @PLUGIN_TARGET@: foo.lo
> $(LIBTOOL) --mode=link --tag=CC $(CCLD) -o @PLUGIN_TARGET@ \
> foo.lo -avoid-version -module
>
> install-exec-hook: @PLUGIN_TARGET@
> $(LIBTOOL) --mode=install $(INSTALL) @PLUTIN_TARGET@ \
> $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)
>
>
> ?
Hi,
Yes, I can write my own automake rules.
But then I have to reverse engineer each automake version and add
AM_CFLAGS, AM_LDFLAGS, CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, target specific flags, or
anything automake generates.
I expected libtool to allow override these kind of settings... So I
proposed to add -soname argument. I think it is very simple and may
make live easier if needed.
But if you totally against adding this I will consider maintaining
specific automake rules.
Thanks!
Alon.
- Customizing soname, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/03/27
- Re: Customizing soname, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/27
- Re: Customizing soname, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/03/27
- Re: Customizing soname, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/27
- Re: Customizing soname, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/03/28
- Re: Customizing soname, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/28
- Re: Customizing soname, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/03/28
- Re: Customizing soname, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/28
- Re: Customizing soname, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/28
- Re: Customizing soname, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/03/28
- Re: Customizing soname, Roumen Petrov, 2008/03/28
- Re: Customizing soname, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/03/28
- Re: Customizing soname, Roumen Petrov, 2008/03/29