[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: move to git
From: |
Dan Nicholson |
Subject: |
Re: move to git |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:15:39 -0700 |
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> * Dan Nicholson wrote on Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:01:00AM CEST:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Gary V. Vaughan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > > a-machine-with-git$ git-clone http://git.sv.gnu.org/libtool.git libtool
> > > a-machine-with-git$ scp libtool address@hidden:
> > > a-machine-with-git$ ssh address@hidden
> > > some-machine-without-git$ cd libtool
> > > some-machine-without-git$ ./bootstrap
>
>
> > With gitweb, there's a far easier process:
> >
> > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=libtool.git;a=snapshot;h=HEAD;sf=tgz
> >
> > That would be the snapshot link under a tree view.
>
> Which isn't bootstrapped, which is the problem under consideration.
> Also, please note that some systems don't have easy net access.
> But the problem described above is whether or not git should be
> a prerequisite for bootstrapping libtool (because git describe would
> be used in order to produce a meaningful inter-release version number).
Sorry about that. About a minute later I realized that wasn't the
issue at all. Receding into the background...
--
Dan
- move to git, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Eric Blake, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Andreas Schwab, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Eric Blake, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Andreas Schwab, 2008/04/17
Re: move to git, Andreas Schwab, 2008/04/18