[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:05:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
Hello Alon,
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:09:43PM CEST:
>
> I want to make a shared library without dependencies. I compile the
> dependencies in PIC mode, so it should be compatible.
> I also require this on Windows, in order to build a DLL without
> OpenSSL external dependency.
Sorry, but I fail to understand your problem description. Is it that
liba uses a function from libb, but you would like to use
libtool --mode=link $CC -o liba.la a1.lo a2.lo -rpath $libdir
rather than
libtool --mode=link $CC -no-undefined -o liba.la a1.lo a2.lo libb.lo -rpath
$libdir
? Well, on w32, you cannot create DLLs that have unresolved symbols.
That's simply not possible.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Shared library - static link specific dependency, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/06/05
- Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/06/06
- Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/14
- Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/06/14
- Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/14
- Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/06/14
- Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/14
- Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency, Alon Bar-Lev, 2008/06/14
- Re: Shared library - static link specific dependency, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/14