[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:39:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Ralf,
Thanks for the debugging.
On Thu 13 Nov 2008 21:46, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
> * Andy Wingo wrote on Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:41:15AM CET:
>> >> >
>> >> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2008-11/msg00012.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Just to recap, the bug is that having
>> >> >> "../../../gst/libgstreamer-0.10.la" on the link line expands into
>> >> >> "-L../../../gst/.libs -lgstreamer-0.10" instead of
>> >> >> "../../../gst/.libs/libgstreamer-0.10.dylib". I tested replacing the
>> >> >> "-L -l" combination with the path to the dylib, and that seems to
>> >> >> work.
>
>> But the badness is still there, of course, on line 6985, column 466:
>>
>> -L/opt/yobuild/lib -L../../../gst/.libs -lgstreamer-0.10
>
> This shouldn't happen on darwin.
>
> Here is where it happens the first time in your trace:
>
>> + test -n ''
>> + test lib = prog
>> + test link '!=' relink
>> + add_shlibpath=
>> + add_dir=
>> + add=
>> + lib_linked=yes
>> + case $hardcode_action in
So, from my libtool:
~/src/yobuild/gstreamer$ grep ^hardcode libtool
hardcode_into_libs=no
hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""
hardcode_libdir_flag_spec_ld=""
hardcode_libdir_separator=""
hardcode_direct=yes
hardcode_direct_absolute=no
hardcode_minus_L=no
hardcode_shlibpath_var=unsupported
hardcode_automatic=yes
hardcode_action=immediate
>> + test yes = no (*)
Thus this test corresponds to libe 5229 of ltmain.m4sh:
if test "$hardcode_direct" = no; then
Which indeed, hardcode_direct is yes. We fall through to the -L -l case
on 5259:
>> + test no = no
>> + case $host in
>> + add_dir=-L../../../gst/.libs
>> + add=-lgstreamer-0.10
> What I don't understand is: your --config output had
> | hardcode_direct=no
>
> so something set this to "yes" in the meantime. That bit is wrong.
>
> Any chance the package you are building is using a patched ltmain.sh
> file?
I don't think anything is patching ltmain.sh, no. And while I'm pretty
sure that I did invoked ./libtool --config correctly before, now it's
giving me different results -- I must have done something to it in the
meantime (but I really don't know what), or invoked it incorrectly.
(This bug still manifests itself in the same way though.) Attaching the
--config log.
So! Where to from here? Sorry for any confusion wrt the --config log.
Andy
libtool-config
Description: ./libtool --config
- fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?, Andy Wingo, 2008/11/11
- Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/11/11
- Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?, Andy Wingo, 2008/11/12
- Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/11/12
- Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?, Andy Wingo, 2008/11/13
- Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/11/13
- Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/11/17
- Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?, Andy Wingo, 2008/11/19