|
From: | Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: | Re: linking problems on SL6 |
Date: | Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:52:05 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110906 Fedora/3.1.14-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.14 |
On 11/22/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Mercer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 15:39, Peter O'Gorman<address@hidden> wrote:Glad it works around it. The problem is libtool brokenness, most vendors patch around it in their packaged libtool, e.g. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=libtool.git;a=blob;f=libtool-2.2.10-rpath.patch;h=d0d6d82178642658e6aca5a28d36813158980ca3;hb=HEADIs there any reason something like this isn't done in the source so vendors don't have to patch? Apart from it being a hack that is :-)
I'm not sure if we ever looked for what distros use what layout for multilibs, and how to detect them.
There was a patch somewere which was slow, but ended up correct, using ldconfig. I'll look for it again.
Peter
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |