libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What happened to libtool transitive DSOs?


From: John Calcote
Subject: Re: What happened to libtool transitive DSOs?
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:05:21 -0600

Hi Bob. It's an ubuntu distro release - Linux Mint 18. Why would they do that?

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, 9:56 AM Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, John Calcote wrote:
>
> After upgrading to libtool 2.4.2, I find that I now have to specify the
> additional secondary .la files that are listed in the primary .la files'
> dependency_libs property, or I get a link error indicating missing DSOs on
> the command line (and I can see that libtool is not adding the transitive
> dependencies like it used to. Why was this change made?

Are you using libtool 2.4.2 as distributed by the FSF or are you using
a modified libtool distributed by an OS vendor?  Some OS vendors
modify libtool like this on purpose.

Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]