[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Submission process for libtool?
From: |
Sam James |
Subject: |
Re: Submission process for libtool? |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Apr 2022 02:20:34 +0100 |
> On 31 Mar 2022, at 21:42, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It was great to see a libtool release, thanks for that!
>
> I upgraded Yocto Project to it in time for our LTS release:
>
> https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=ff7b41573842a403c81f58bee41fc8163a9d7754
>
> so far things seem reasonable, we've had a few minor issues but they're not
> really libtool's fault or concern. One interesting quirk was that the shell
> script optimisation changes made between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7 resulted in very long
> (6,000+ character) pathnames being passed to the C library functions. This
> upset
> our fakeroot emulation but we've fixed that to workaround the issue.
>
Nice and smooth so far as well here.
> Yocto Project is carrying a few patches. I did clean them up and shared many
> of
> them in October:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2021-10/msg00012.html
>
> Some are more important than others and there what I believe are good bug
> fixes
> in there. My questions:
>
> a) Is there a possibility these could be considered for merging?
>
> [snip]
>
Thanks for asking this and am wondering the same thing. Hoping for your patches
to get in (as Yocto's needs often align with ours) and then I plan on revisiting
our (Gentoo's) stack.
> Thanks,
> Richard
Best,
sam
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP