|
From: | Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: | Re: temporarily overriding paper variables |
Date: | Sat, 01 Apr 2023 13:57:02 +0200 |
User-agent: | Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) |
Le mercredi 29 mars 2023 à 21:56 +0200, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
It seems so, yes. Jean, do you have an idea? Shall I submit an issue?
I am not yet sure if this is a bug or not.
This is from page-layout-problem.cc
:
void
Page_layout_problem::append_prob (Prob *prob, Spring const &spring,
Real padding)
{
SCM sky_scm = get_property (prob, "vertical-skylines");
Real minimum_distance = 0;
bool tight_spacing = from_scm<bool> (get_property (prob, "tight-spacing"));
if (is_scm<Skyline_pair> (sky_scm))
{
const Skyline_pair &sky = from_scm<Skyline_pair> (sky_scm);
minimum_distance
= std::max (sky[UP].distance (bottom_skyline_), bottom_loose_baseline_);
bottom_skyline_ = sky[DOWN];
}
else if (auto *sten = unsmob<const Stencil> (get_property (prob, "stencil")))
{
Interval iv = sten->extent (Y_AXIS);
minimum_distance = iv[UP] - bottom_skyline_.max_height ();
bottom_skyline_.clear ();
bottom_skyline_.set_minimum_height (iv[DOWN]);
}
bottom_skyline_
is the skyline that is then used as the bottom skyline of
the markup when determining the spacing from the markup to the next system.
I don't see any place where the code is setting the vertical-skylines
property on
Paper_system
probs that are created from standalone markups.
So for standalone markups, padding is actually not using skyline spacing at all?!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |