Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Classic or Tiny v2.11?

[Ørjan Pettersen]

Well, I guess I go for the Tiny then. Is it possible to connect two 
radio modems to it, since there is two UART connections? I'm doing some 
research on prioritying between different connections, and that require 
different types of modems connected at once.

That's why I was thinking of using Classix, since it have the Gumstix 
header.

Ørjan...

address@hidden wrote:
> Hi Ørjan,
>
> what Code do you want to run? The processor of the Tiny is bored most of
> the time, there is plenty of processing power left. I would suggest to
> use the Tiny, the Classix does need some fixes on the board...it was
> never in high volume usage.
>
> Martin
>
> Am 21.07.2008 um  Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
>   
> > Sorry, it should be Classix, not Classic.
> >
> > Orjanp...
> >
> > Ørjan Pettersen wrote:
> >     
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Witch of the Autopilots is the best to start with? I suppose I need
> > >       
> a
>   
> > > Classix sooner or later since I have some additional payload code to
> > >       
> run.
>   
> > > But in order to get this flying, witch should I start with? Is it
> > > easier to convert to the Classix when I have experience with the
> > >       
> Tiny
>   
> > > v2.11? Or should I just jump straight to the Classix if I need it?
> > >
> > > Is there anyone offering a kit to the Classix? I have not found
> > >       
> anyone.
>   
> > > Orjanp...
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> > >
> > >       
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >     
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>