[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Paparazzi-devel] sky uniformity and roll/pitch bias
From: |
Electro-Technik |
Subject: |
RE: [Paparazzi-devel] sky uniformity and roll/pitch bias |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:21:31 +0100 |
Steve,
It is good the hear about a system going so well. Are you based in the UK?
Regards. Alan K.
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Steve Joyce
Sent: 02 October 2008 16:35
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Paparazzi-devel] sky uniformity and roll/pitch bias
Greetings,
I've been using paparazzi for some time now for some fairly precise
navigation tasks (photo missions) with quite good results. I think I have
my aircraft set up well and the control loops well tuned.
Under some conditions though, the ability to hold course and altitude can
become poor, even to the point of loss of control. My conclusion is that
the distribution of clouds and clear patches in the sky can set up a thermal
bias or "tilted horizon" which gives biased angle estimates. The effect
manifests itself by the plane overshooting turns on one heading and
undershooting them in the opposite heading, and when following lines it may
never quite reach the desired course, but fly along parallel to the line.
This is a bit different than when you have a roll bias due to misalignment
between the sensor axis and the aircraft axis: here it will fly a constant
offset inside a circle in one direction and outside the circle in the other
direction, but there are no course dependent effects. It will also tend to
turn left or right in AUTO1.
It seems that vertical contrast alone is not such a problem, as long as the
sky is fairly uniform- it should only affect the resolution you can measure
the angles. But the worst case seems to be a mostly clear sky with low dark
(warm) clouds approaching from one direction.
I searched the list and haven't found much discussion about this phenomenon,
except from some people who thought that a low sun could bias the sensors (i
haven't personally found this to be much of a problem). So I was wondering
if anyone else could share their experiences, solutions, control system
changes, or tuning strategies to minimize the effect. I guess I would like
to expand the envelope of weather conditions that the plane can navigate
effectively.
My setup is an electric flying wing with the a stock FMA copilot horizontal
sensor mounted on top of the fuselage and a vertical sensor mounted near the
back. The horizontal sensor is oriented at 45 degrees. I run the sensors
at 5v to maintain the stock gains but the output is run through a voltage
divider before being read by the autopilots ADC.
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1682 - Release Date: 9/20/2008
10:24 AM