qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH] vhost_net: should not use max_queue_pairs for non-mq gue


From: Jason Wang
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vhost_net: should not use max_queue_pairs for non-mq guest
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:59:26 +0800

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 3:02 PM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/21/2022 8:47 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:14 PM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> With MQ enabled vdpa device and non-MQ supporting guest e.g.
> >> booting vdpa with mq=on over OVMF of single vqp, it's easy
> >> to hit assert failure as the following:
> >>
> >> ../hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c:560: vhost_vdpa_get_vq_index: Assertion `idx >= 
> >> dev->vq_index && idx < dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs' failed.
> >>
> >> 0  0x00007f8ce3ff3387 in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >> 1  0x00007f8ce3ff4a78 in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >> 2  0x00007f8ce3fec1a6 in __assert_fail_base () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >> 3  0x00007f8ce3fec252 in  () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >> 4  0x0000558f52d79421 in vhost_vdpa_get_vq_index (dev=<optimized out>, 
> >> idx=<optimized out>) at ../hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c:563
> >> 5  0x0000558f52d79421 in vhost_vdpa_get_vq_index (dev=<optimized out>, 
> >> idx=<optimized out>) at ../hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c:558
> >> 6  0x0000558f52d7329a in vhost_virtqueue_mask (hdev=0x558f55c01800, 
> >> vdev=0x558f568f91f0, n=2, mask=<optimized out>) at 
> >> ../hw/virtio/vhost.c:1557
> >> 7  0x0000558f52c6b89a in virtio_pci_set_guest_notifier 
> >> (d=d@entry=0x558f568f0f60, n=n@entry=2, assign=assign@entry=true, 
> >> with_irqfd=with_irqfd@entry=false)
> >>     at ../hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c:974
> >> 8  0x0000558f52c6c0d8 in virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers (d=0x558f568f0f60, 
> >> nvqs=3, assign=true) at ../hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c:1019
> >> 9  0x0000558f52bf091d in vhost_net_start (dev=dev@entry=0x558f568f91f0, 
> >> ncs=0x558f56937cd0, data_queue_pairs=data_queue_pairs@entry=1, 
> >> cvq=cvq@entry=1)
> >>     at ../hw/net/vhost_net.c:361
> >> 10 0x0000558f52d4e5e7 in virtio_net_set_status (status=<optimized out>, 
> >> n=0x558f568f91f0) at ../hw/net/virtio-net.c:289
> >> 11 0x0000558f52d4e5e7 in virtio_net_set_status (vdev=0x558f568f91f0, 
> >> status=15 '\017') at ../hw/net/virtio-net.c:370
> >> 12 0x0000558f52d6c4b2 in virtio_set_status 
> >> (vdev=vdev@entry=0x558f568f91f0, val=val@entry=15 '\017') at 
> >> ../hw/virtio/virtio.c:1945
> >> 13 0x0000558f52c69eff in virtio_pci_common_write (opaque=0x558f568f0f60, 
> >> addr=<optimized out>, val=<optimized out>, size=<optimized out>) at 
> >> ../hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c:1292
> >> 14 0x0000558f52d15d6e in memory_region_write_accessor (mr=0x558f568f19d0, 
> >> addr=20, value=<optimized out>, size=1, shift=<optimized out>, 
> >> mask=<optimized out>, attrs=...)
> >>     at ../softmmu/memory.c:492
> >> 15 0x0000558f52d127de in access_with_adjusted_size (addr=addr@entry=20, 
> >> value=value@entry=0x7f8cdbffe748, size=size@entry=1, 
> >> access_size_min=<optimized out>, access_size_max=<optimized out>, 
> >> access_fn=0x558f52d15cf0 <memory_region_write_accessor>, 
> >> mr=0x558f568f19d0, attrs=...) at ../softmmu/memory.c:554
> >> 16 0x0000558f52d157ef in memory_region_dispatch_write 
> >> (mr=mr@entry=0x558f568f19d0, addr=20, data=<optimized out>, op=<optimized 
> >> out>, attrs=attrs@entry=...)
> >>     at ../softmmu/memory.c:1504
> >> 17 0x0000558f52d078e7 in flatview_write_continue 
> >> (fv=fv@entry=0x7f8accbc3b90, addr=addr@entry=103079215124, attrs=..., 
> >> ptr=ptr@entry=0x7f8ce6300028, len=len@entry=1, addr1=<optimized out>, 
> >> l=<optimized out>, mr=0x558f568f19d0) at 
> >> /home/opc/qemu-upstream/include/qemu/host-utils.h:165
> >> 18 0x0000558f52d07b06 in flatview_write (fv=0x7f8accbc3b90, 
> >> addr=103079215124, attrs=..., buf=0x7f8ce6300028, len=1) at 
> >> ../softmmu/physmem.c:2822
> >> 19 0x0000558f52d0b36b in address_space_write (as=<optimized out>, 
> >> addr=<optimized out>, attrs=..., buf=buf@entry=0x7f8ce6300028, 
> >> len=<optimized out>)
> >>     at ../softmmu/physmem.c:2914
> >> 20 0x0000558f52d0b3da in address_space_rw (as=<optimized out>, 
> >> addr=<optimized out>, attrs=...,
> >>     attrs@entry=..., buf=buf@entry=0x7f8ce6300028, len=<optimized out>, 
> >> is_write=<optimized out>) at ../softmmu/physmem.c:2924
> >> 21 0x0000558f52dced09 in kvm_cpu_exec (cpu=cpu@entry=0x558f55c2da60) at 
> >> ../accel/kvm/kvm-all.c:2903
> >> 22 0x0000558f52dcfabd in kvm_vcpu_thread_fn (arg=arg@entry=0x558f55c2da60) 
> >> at ../accel/kvm/kvm-accel-ops.c:49
> >> 23 0x0000558f52f9f04a in qemu_thread_start (args=<optimized out>) at 
> >> ../util/qemu-thread-posix.c:556
> >> 24 0x00007f8ce4392ea5 in start_thread () at /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >> 25 0x00007f8ce40bb9fd in clone () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >>
> >> The cause for the assert failure is due to that the vhost_dev index
> >> for the ctrl vq was not aligned with actual one in use by the guest.
> >> Upon multiqueue feature negotiation in virtio_net_set_multiqueue(),
> >> if guest doesn't support multiqueue, the guest vq layout would shrink
> >> to single queue pair of 3 vqs in total (rx, tx and ctrl). This results
> >> in ctrl_vq taking a different vhost_dev group index than the default
> >> n->max_queue_pairs, the latter of which is only valid for multiqueue
> >> guest. While on those additional vqs not exposed to the guest,
> >> vhost_net_set_vq_index() never populated vq_index properly, hence
> >> getting the assert failure.
> >>
> >> A possible fix is to pick the correct vhost_dev group for the control
> >> vq according to this table [*]:
> >>
> >> vdpa tool / QEMU arg / guest config    / ctrl_vq group index
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> max_vqp 8 / mq=on    / mq=off  (UEFI) => data_queue_pairs
> >> max_vqp 8 / mq=on    / mq=on  (Linux) => n->max_queue_pairs(>1)
> >> max_vqp 8 / mq=off   / mq=on  (Linux) => n->max_queue_pairs(=1)
> >>
> >> [*] Please see FIXME in the code for open question and discussion
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
> >> ---
> >>   hw/net/vhost_net.c     | 13 +++++++++----
> >>   hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>   2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/net/vhost_net.c b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> >> index 30379d2..9a4479b 100644
> >> --- a/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> >> +++ b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> >> @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ int vhost_net_start(VirtIODevice *dev, NetClientState 
> >> *ncs,
> >>       BusState *qbus = BUS(qdev_get_parent_bus(DEVICE(dev)));
> >>       VirtioBusState *vbus = VIRTIO_BUS(qbus);
> >>       VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(vbus);
> >> +    bool mq = virtio_host_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ);
> >>       int total_notifiers = data_queue_pairs * 2 + cvq;
> >>       VirtIONet *n = VIRTIO_NET(dev);
> >>       int nvhosts = data_queue_pairs + cvq;
> >> @@ -343,7 +344,7 @@ int vhost_net_start(VirtIODevice *dev, NetClientState 
> >> *ncs,
> >>           if (i < data_queue_pairs) {
> >>               peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, i);
> >>           } else { /* Control Virtqueue */
> >> -            peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, n->max_queue_pairs);
> >> +            peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, mq ? data_queue_pairs : 
> >> n->max_queue_pairs);
> >>           }
> >>
> >>           net = get_vhost_net(peer);
> >> @@ -368,7 +369,7 @@ int vhost_net_start(VirtIODevice *dev, NetClientState 
> >> *ncs,
> >>           if (i < data_queue_pairs) {
> >>               peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, i);
> >>           } else {
> >> -            peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, n->max_queue_pairs);
> >> +            peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, mq ? data_queue_pairs : 
> >> n->max_queue_pairs);
> >>           }
> >>           r = vhost_net_start_one(get_vhost_net(peer), dev);
> >>
> >> @@ -390,7 +391,10 @@ int vhost_net_start(VirtIODevice *dev, NetClientState 
> >> *ncs,
> >>
> >>   err_start:
> >>       while (--i >= 0) {
> >> -        peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs , i);
> >> +        if (mq)
> >> +            peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, i < data_queue_pairs ? i : 
> >> data_queue_pairs);
> >> +        else
> >> +            peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, i < data_queue_pairs ? i : 
> >> n->max_queue_pairs);
> >>           vhost_net_stop_one(get_vhost_net(peer), dev);
> >>       }
> >>       e = k->set_guest_notifiers(qbus->parent, total_notifiers, false);
> >> @@ -409,6 +413,7 @@ void vhost_net_stop(VirtIODevice *dev, NetClientState 
> >> *ncs,
> >>       VirtioBusState *vbus = VIRTIO_BUS(qbus);
> >>       VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(vbus);
> >>       VirtIONet *n = VIRTIO_NET(dev);
> >> +    bool mq = virtio_host_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ);
> >>       NetClientState *peer;
> >>       int total_notifiers = data_queue_pairs * 2 + cvq;
> >>       int nvhosts = data_queue_pairs + cvq;
> >> @@ -418,7 +423,7 @@ void vhost_net_stop(VirtIODevice *dev, NetClientState 
> >> *ncs,
> >>           if (i < data_queue_pairs) {
> >>               peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, i);
> >>           } else {
> >> -            peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, n->max_queue_pairs);
> >> +            peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, mq ? data_queue_pairs : 
> >> n->max_queue_pairs);
> >>           }
> >>           vhost_net_stop_one(get_vhost_net(peer), dev);
> >>       }
> >> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> index 27ea706..623476e 100644
> >> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> @@ -1097,7 +1097,30 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_dev_start(struct vhost_dev 
> >> *dev, bool started)
> >>           vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_uninit(dev, dev->nvqs);
> >>       }
> >>
> >> -    if (dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs != dev->vq_index_end) {
> >> +    /* FIXME the vhost_dev group for the control vq may have bogus nvqs=2
> >> +     * value rather than nvqs=1. This can happen in case the guest doesn't
> >> +     * support multiqueue, as a result of 
> >> virtio_net_change_num_queue_pairs()
> >> +     * destroying and rebuilding all the vqs, the guest index for control 
> >> vq
> >> +     * will no longer align with the host's. Currently 
> >> net_init_vhost_vdpa()
> >> +     * only initializes all vhost_dev's and net_clients once during
> >> +     * net_client_init1() time, way earlier before multiqueue feature
> >> +     * negotiation can kick in.
> > See below, it looks like the code doesn't find the correct vhost_dev.
> >
> >> +     *
> >> +     * Discussion - some possible fixes so far I can think of:
> >> +     *
> >> +     * option 1: fix vhost_net->dev.nvqs and nc->is_datapath in place for
> >> +     * vdpa's ctrl vq, or rebuild all vdpa's vhost_dev groups and the
> >> +     * net_client array, in the virtio_net_set_multiqueue() path;
> >> +     *
> >> +     * option 2: fix vhost_dev->nvqs in place at vhost_vdpa_set_features()
> >> +     * before coming down to vhost_vdpa_dev_start() (Q: nc->is_datapath
> >> +     * seems only used in virtio_net_device_realize, is it relevant?);
> > Relevant but not directly related, for the vhost_dev where
> > nc->is_datapath is false, it will assume it is backed by a single
> > queue not a queue pair.
> >
> >> +     *
> >> +     * option 3: use host queue index all along in vhost-vdpa ioctls 
> >> instead
> >> +     * of using guest vq index, so that vhost_net_start/stop() can remain
> >> +     * as-is today
> >> +     */
> > Note that the vq_index of each vhost_dev is assigned during
> > vhost_net_start() according to whether or not the MQ or CVQ is
> > negotiated in vhost_net_start()
> >
> >      for (i = 0; i < nvhosts; i++) {
> >
> >          if (i < data_queue_pairs) {
> >              peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, i);
> >          } else { /* Control Virtqueue */
> >              peer = qemu_get_peer(ncs, n->max_queue_pairs);
> >          }
> >
> >          net = get_vhost_net(peer);
> >          vhost_net_set_vq_index(net, i * 2, index_end);
> >
> > It means some of the peers won't be used when MQ is not negotiated. So
> > it looks to me the evil came from virtio_net_get_notifier_mask().
> Yes, there it is. Where the control virtqueue first ever needs a
> guest_notifier for vhost_dev.
> > Where it doesn't mask the correct vhost dev when the guest doesn't
> > support MQ but the host does. So we had option 4:
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > index 2087516253..5e9ac019cd 100644
> > --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > @@ -3179,7 +3179,13 @@ static void
> > virtio_net_guest_notifier_mask(VirtIODevice *vdev, int idx,
> >                                              bool mask)
> >   {
> >       VirtIONet *n = VIRTIO_NET(vdev);
> > -    NetClientState *nc = qemu_get_subqueue(n->nic, vq2q(idx));
> > +    NetClientState *nc;
> > +
> > +    if (!virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) && idx == 2) {
> Hmmm, I thought it would be more natural to align the layout of
> vhost_dev's with that of virtqueue's, not the other way around.

The problem is that we need to make sure it works for vhost_net as
well where it doesn't support cvq.

> Not sure
> how this vhost_dev selection scheme may work with additional queues
> discovered through transport specific mechanism, such as the admin
> virtqueue, but I can live with it for now:
>
> --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> @@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ static void virtio_net_vhost_status(VirtIONet *n,
> uint8_t status)
>       VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(n);
>       NetClientState *nc = qemu_get_queue(n->nic);
>       int queue_pairs = n->multiqueue ? n->max_queue_pairs : 1;
> -    int cvq = n->max_ncs - n->max_queue_pairs;
> +    int cvq = virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ) ?
> +              n->max_ncs - n->max_queue_pairs : 0;

Any reason for this line?

Btw, would you mind to post a formal patch for this?

Thanks

>
>       if (!get_vhost_net(nc->peer)) {
>           return;
> @@ -3161,8 +3162,14 @@ static NetClientInfo net_virtio_info = {
>   static bool virtio_net_guest_notifier_pending(VirtIODevice *vdev, int idx)
>   {
>       VirtIONet *n = VIRTIO_NET(vdev);
> -    NetClientState *nc = qemu_get_subqueue(n->nic, vq2q(idx));
> +    NetClientState *nc;
>       assert(n->vhost_started);
> +    if (!virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) && idx == 2) {
> +        assert(virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ));
> +        nc = qemu_get_subqueue(n->nic, n->max_queue_pairs);
> +    } else {
> +        nc = qemu_get_subqueue(n->nic, vq2q(idx));
> +    }
>       return vhost_net_virtqueue_pending(get_vhost_net(nc->peer), idx);
>   }
>
> @@ -3170,8 +3177,14 @@ static void
> virtio_net_guest_notifier_mask(VirtIODevice *vdev, int idx,
>                                              bool mask)
>   {
>       VirtIONet *n = VIRTIO_NET(vdev);
> -    NetClientState *nc = qemu_get_subqueue(n->nic, vq2q(idx));
> +    NetClientState *nc;
>       assert(n->vhost_started);
> +    if (!virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) && idx == 2) {
> +        assert(virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ));
> +        nc = qemu_get_subqueue(n->nic, n->max_queue_pairs);
> +    } else {
> +        nc = qemu_get_subqueue(n->nic, vq2q(idx));
> +    }
>       vhost_net_virtqueue_mask(get_vhost_net(nc->peer),
>                                vdev, idx, mask);
>   }
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Siwei
>
> > +        nc = qemu_get_subqueue(n->nic, n->max_queue_pairs);
> > +    } else {
> > +        nc = qemu_get_subqueue(n->nic, vq2q(idx));
> > +    }
> >       assert(n->vhost_started);
> >       vhost_net_virtqueue_mask(get_vhost_net(nc->peer),
> >                                vdev, idx, mask);
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >> +    if (dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs < dev->vq_index_end) {
> >>           return 0;
> >>       }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.1
> >>
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]