Re: [PATCH v2 07/53] migration/rdma: Clean up two more harmless signed vs. unsigned issues

[Juan Quintela]

Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> qemu_rdma_exchange_get_response() compares int parameter @expecting
> with uint32_t head->type.  Actual arguments are non-negative
> enumeration constants, RDMAControlHeader uint32_t member type, or
> qemu_rdma_exchange_recv() int parameter expecting.  Actual arguments
> for the latter are non-negative enumeration constants.  Change both
> parameters to uint32_t.
>
> In qio_channel_rdma_readv(), loop control variable @i is ssize_t, and
> counts from 0 up to @niov, which is size_t.  Change @i to size_t.
>
> While there, make qio_channel_rdma_readv() and
> qio_channel_rdma_writev() more consistent: change the former's @done
> to ssize_t, and delete the latter's useless initialization of @len.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>

Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>