qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict


From: Hanna Czenczek
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:40:48 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1

On 16.10.23 10:45, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:32, Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com> wrote:
diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-user.h b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-user.h
index 9f9ddf878d..1d4121431b 100644
--- a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-user.h
+++ b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-user.h
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ enum VhostUserProtocolFeature {
    VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_INBAND_NOTIFICATIONS = 14,
    VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_MEM_SLOTS = 15,
    VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS = 16,
-    VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SHARED_OBJECT = 17,
+    /* Feature 17 reserved for VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP. */
+    VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SHARED_OBJECT = 18,
    VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MAX
};

May I ask, why not define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP as well instead of a comment mention?

No particular reason, it’s just what I had planned to do for a while in other series that would introduce feature bits (e.g. https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-07/msg02452.html). I think I took that from libvhost-user, which does this for VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS.

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>

Thanks!

Hanna




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]