Re: [PATCH] vhost-user: Fix protocol feature bit conflict

[Hanna Czenczek]

On 17.10.23 09:53, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-10-23, 09:51, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> > Not that I’m really opposed to that, but I don’t see the problem with just
> > doing that in the same work that makes qemu actually use this flag, exactly
> > because it’s just a -1/+1 change.
> >
> > I can send a v2, but should I do the same for libvhost-user and define the
> > flag there?  Do I have to add a patch to do the same for F_STATUS, which so
> > far only got a placeholder comment?
> Sure, that's fine too.

I would rather not, though, and don’t see a tangible benefit in doing so.