On Tue, 17 Oct 2023, Helge Deller wrote:
On 10/17/23 18:13, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023, deller@kernel.org wrote:
From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
---
hw/net/tulip.c | 2 +-
include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/net/tulip.c b/hw/net/tulip.c
index 915e5fb595..11d866e431 100644
--- a/hw/net/tulip.c
+++ b/hw/net/tulip.c
@@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static void tulip_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void
*data)
k->exit = pci_tulip_exit;
k->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_DEC;
k->device_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_DEC_21143;
- k->subsystem_vendor_id = 0x103c;
+ k->subsystem_vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP;
k->subsystem_id = 0x104f;
k->class_id = PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET;
dc->vmsd = &vmstate_pci_tulip;
diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h
index 85469b9b53..3c0e72df0e 100644
--- a/include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h
@@ -171,6 +171,8 @@
#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_DEC 0x1011
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_DEC_21143 0x0019
+#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP 0x103c
+
Did not notice this in first round, sorry. These seems to be sorted
(there's a comment further up about that) so this should be between
AMD and TI a bit more down.
The list isn't sorted at all. I think the comment just wants to
It is still mostly sorted except where people did not get how. Try
grep PCI_VENDOR_ID_ pci_ids.h
say that you should mention the vendor before the devices.
I think it says that PCI_VENDOR_IDs should be sorted and then DEVICE_IDs within
them should also be sorted but device IDs intervene VENDOR_IDs so the sorting
of VENDOR_IDs may not be obvious at first sight.
Anyway, as the list currently is, there are multiple positions
where HP could be added...
Yes, some IDs already break this sorting but we could still avoid breaking it
more. [...]