qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] migration: Fix parse_ramblock() on overwritten retvals


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration: Fix parse_ramblock() on overwritten retvals
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 13:40:29 +0100

On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 21:40, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> It's possible that some errors can be overwritten with success retval later
> on, and then ignored.  Always capture all errors and report.
>
> Reported by Coverity 1522861, but actually I spot one more in the same
> function.

The other one is CID 1522862, I think.

> Fixes: CID 1522861
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

> ---
>  migration/ram.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index c844151ee9..d8bdb53a8f 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -3888,6 +3888,8 @@ static int parse_ramblock(QEMUFile *f, RAMBlock *block, 
> ram_addr_t length)
>          ret = qemu_ram_resize(block, length, &local_err);
>          if (local_err) {
>              error_report_err(local_err);
> +            assert(ret < 0);

We usually don't bother asserting for this kind of "function
reports errors two ways" code.

> +            return ret;
>          }

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]