qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 00/52] migration/rdma: Error handling fixes


From: Juan Quintela
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/52] migration/rdma: Error handling fixes
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 11:25:42 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux)

Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 08:00:34PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 12:49:46PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:41:14PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> > Oh dear, where to start.  There's so much wrong, and in pretty obvious
>> >> > ways.  This code should never have passed review.  I'm refraining from
>> >> > saying more; see the commit messages instead.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Issues remaining after this series include:
>> >> > 
>> >> > * Terrible error messages
>> >> > 
>> >> > * Some error message cascades remain
>> >> > 
>> >> > * There is no written contract for QEMUFileHooks, and the
>> >> >   responsibility for reporting errors is unclear
>> >> 
>> >> Even being removed.. because no one is really extending that..
>> >> 
>> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230509120700.78359-1-quintela@redhat.com/#t
>> >
>> > One day (in another 5-10 years) I still hope we'll get to
>> > the point where QEMUFile itself is obsolete :-)
>> 
>> If you see the patches on list, I have move rate limit check outside of
>> QEMUFile, so right now it is only a buffer to write in the main
>> migration thread.
>
> Can you point me to that patch(es) as I'm not identifying
> them yet.

Yet another set of counters.

They are on today PULL request.

Later, Juan.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]