Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/riscv/cpu: fix sifive_u 32/64bits boot in riscv-to-apply.next

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Hi,

I mentioned that the bug were found in riscv-to-apply.next but forgot to
mentioned that the patches were also based on top of it as well:

https://github.com/alistair23/qemu/tree/riscv-to-apply.next


Thanks,


Daniel

On 1/10/23 17:14, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found this bug when testing my avocado changes in riscv-to-apply.next.
> The sifive_u board, both 32 and 64 bits, stopped booting OpenSBI. The
> guest hangs indefinitely.
>
> Git bisect points that this patch broke things:
>
> 8c3f35d25e7e98655c609b6c1e9f103b9240f8f8 is the first bad commit
> commit 8c3f35d25e7e98655c609b6c1e9f103b9240f8f8
> Author: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
> Date:   Wed Dec 28 14:20:21 2022 +0800
>
>      target/riscv: add support for Zca extension
>      
>      Modify the check for C extension to Zca (C implies Zca)
> (https://github.com/alistair23/qemu/commit/8c3f35d25e7e98655c609b6c1e9f103b9240f8f8)
>      
>
> But this patch per se isn't doing anything wrong. The root of the
> problem is that this patch makes assumptions based on the previous
> patch:
>
> commit a2b409aa6cadc1ed9715e1ab916ddd3dade0ba85
> Author: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
> Date:   Wed Dec 28 14:20:20 2022 +0800
>
>      target/riscv: add cfg properties for Zc* extension
> (https://github.com/alistair23/qemu/commit/a2b409aa6cadc1ed9715e1ab916ddd3dade0ba85)
>
> Which added a lot of logic and assumptions that are being skipped by all
> the SiFive boards because, during riscv_cpu_realize(), we have this
> code:
>
>      /* If only MISA_EXT is unset for misa, then set it from properties */
>      if (env->misa_ext == 0) {
>          uint32_t ext = 0;
>          (...)
>      }
>
> In short, we have a lot of code that are being skipped by all SiFive
> CPUs because these CPUs are setting a non-zero value in set_misa() in
> their respective cpu_init() functions.
>
> It's possible to just hack in and fix the SiFive problem in isolate, but
> I believe we can do better and allow all riscv_cpu_realize() to be executed
> for all CPUs, regardless of what they've done during their cpu_init().
>
>
> Daniel Henrique Barboza (2):
>    target/riscv/cpu: set cpu->cfg in register_cpu_props()
>    target/riscv/cpu.c: do not skip misa logic in riscv_cpu_realize()
>
>   target/riscv/cpu.c | 525 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>   target/riscv/cpu.h |   4 +
>   2 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 237 deletions(-)