Re: qemu icicle kit es

[Conor Dooley]

On 13 January 2023 00:35:11 GMT, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 2:03 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> +CC Bin Meng
>>

>> Bin Meng, you're listed as a supporter (in master anyway) but is that
>> still accurate? I figure there's a good chance it isn't anymore?
>> Have you tested the platform from HSS init at all lately?
>
>Yes, I am still maintaining the QEMU PolarFire SoC. The WiKi page
>listed the exact HSS version I tested and if it doesn't, it should be
>a regression in QEMU. If yes, I would like to have a look at that.

That'd be great.
I submitted a few patches for fixing the direct kernel boot & hopefully haven't 
broken anything!
I'll try to test it also, if I get some time.

>Running more recent HSS is known to break, because QEMU does not
>follow up quite closely with the HSS implementation as HSS has evolved
>quite quickly in the past.

Yeah, although the rate of change has slowed down now.
I think there's a decent but of emulation missing though to get a recent 
version of the HSS working.

Thanks,
Conor.