qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: Set the correct exception for implict G-stage


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: Set the correct exception for implict G-stage translation fail
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 13:37:58 +1000

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:32 PM Jason Chien <jason.chien@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> The privileged spec states:
> For a memory access made to support VS-stage address translation (such as
> to read/write a VS-level page table), permissions are checked as though
> for a load or store, not for the original access type. However, any
> exception is always reported for the original access type (instruction,
> load, or store/AMO).
>
> The current implementation converts the access type to LOAD if implicit
> G-stage translation fails which results in only reporting "Load guest-page
> fault". This commit removes the convertion of access type, so the reported
> exception conforms to the spec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Chien <jason.chien@sifive.com>

Thanks!

Applied to riscv-to-apply.next

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> index a944f25694..ff2a1469dc 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> @@ -1277,7 +1277,6 @@ bool riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, 
> int size,
>          if (ret == TRANSLATE_G_STAGE_FAIL) {
>              first_stage_error = false;
>              two_stage_indirect_error = true;
> -            access_type = MMU_DATA_LOAD;
>          }
>
>          qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]