On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 12:23:19PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 6/9/23 11:16, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This file is not needed for some time now. All the stubs
implemented in
it (kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu() and kvm_riscv_set_irq()) are wrapped in
'if
kvm_enabled()' blocks that the compiler will rip it out in non-KVM
builds.
We'll also add non-KVM stubs for all functions declared in
kvm_riscv.h.
All stubs are implemented as g_asserted_not_reached(), meaning
that we
won't support them in non-KVM builds. This is done by other kvm
headers
like kvm_arm.h and kvm_ppc.h.
Aren't them also protected by kvm_enabled()? Otherwise shouldn't they?
Yes, I think your earlier suggestion that we always invoke kvm
functions
from non-kvm files with a kvm_enabled() guard makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/kvm-stub.c | 30 ------------------------------
target/riscv/kvm_riscv.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
target/riscv/meson.build | 2 +-
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 target/riscv/kvm-stub.c
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm_riscv.h b/target/riscv/kvm_riscv.h
index f6501e68e2..c9ecd9a967 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm_riscv.h
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm_riscv.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#ifndef QEMU_KVM_RISCV_H
#define QEMU_KVM_RISCV_H
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
void kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj);
At a glance kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() is.
Keep the prototype declared (before #ifdef CONFIG_KVM) is enough
for the
compiler to elide it.
Yes, when building without CONFIG_KVM enabled it's actually better
to not
have the stubs, since the compiler will catch an unguarded kvm function
call (assuming the kvm function is defined in a file which is only
built
with CONFIG_KVM).
Unfortunately we don't have anything to protect developers from
forgetting
the kvm_enabled() guard when building a QEMU which supports both TCG
and
KVM. We could try to remember to put 'assert(kvm_enabled())' at the
start
of each of these types of functions. It looks like mips does that for a
couple functions.