qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v10 00/20] riscv: 'max' CPU, detect user choice in TCG


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/20] riscv: 'max' CPU, detect user choice in TCG
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:00:53 +1000

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:25 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In this version we have a change in patch 3. It was causing a build
> break with --enable-debug builds that weren't being detected by regular
> gitlab CI but was detected when running the merge CI [1]. The problem is
> reproducible by any risc-v --enable-debug build.
>
> I ended up leaving kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties implementation
> inside cpu.c, since it can't be easily moved to kvm.c at this point,
> while adding its function declaration in kvm_riscv.h since it's a KVM
> only function. This is temporary, not a pattern we want to promote.
> We'll move the function to kvm.c when splitting accelerators logic in
> "riscv: split TCG/KVM accelerators from cpu.c", patch 08 in the current
> version of that series [2].
>
> Series rebased on top of master. Only patch 3 is missing acks.
>
> Changes from v9:
> - patch 3:
>   - use #ifdef CONFIG_KVM instead of #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>   - helper renamed to kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties
>   - helper is declared in kvm_riscv.h
> - v9 link: 
> 20230901194627.1214811-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com/">https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20230901194627.1214811-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com/
>
> [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-09/msg01729.html
> [2] 
> 20230906091647.1667171-9-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com/">https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20230906091647.1667171-9-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com/
>
> Daniel Henrique Barboza (20):
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split CPU options from riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: skip 'bool' check when filtering KVM props
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split kvm prop handling to its own helper
>   target/riscv: add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() to riscv_cpu_options[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split non-ratified exts from
>     riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split vendor exts from riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: limit cfg->vext_spec log message
>   target/riscv: add 'max' CPU type
>   avocado, risc-v: add tuxboot tests for 'max' CPU
>   target/riscv: deprecate the 'any' CPU type
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: use offset in isa_ext_is_enabled/update_enabled
>   target/riscv: make CPUCFG() macro public
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: use cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() during realize()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig
>   target/riscv: use isa_ext_update_enabled() in
>     init_max_cpu_extensions()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: honor user choice in cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: consider user option with RVG

Thanks!

Applied to riscv-to-apply.next

Alistair

>
>  docs/about/deprecated.rst         |  12 +
>  target/riscv/cpu-qom.h            |   1 +
>  target/riscv/cpu.c                | 564 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  target/riscv/cpu.h                |   2 +
>  target/riscv/kvm.c                |   8 +-
>  target/riscv/kvm_riscv.h          |   3 +
>  tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py |  32 ++
>  7 files changed, 452 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]