qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Add epmp to extensions list and rename it to smepmp


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add epmp to extensions list and rename it to smepmp
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:15:13 +1000

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 9:08 PM Mayuresh Chitale
<mchitale@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> From: Himanshu Chauhan <hchauhan@ventanamicro.com>
>
> Smepmp is a ratified extension which qemu refers to as epmp.
> Rename epmp to smepmp and add it to extension list so that
> it is added to the isa string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Chauhan <hchauhan@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c |  9 +++++----
>  target/riscv/cpu.h |  2 +-
>  target/riscv/csr.c |  6 +++---
>  target/riscv/pmp.c | 12 ++++++------
>  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index befa64528f..0fb01788e7 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static const struct isa_ext_data isa_edata_arr[] = {
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt),
> +    ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smepmp, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smepmp),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs),
> @@ -488,7 +489,7 @@ static void rv32_ibex_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>      set_satp_mode_max_supported(cpu, VM_1_10_MBARE);
>  #endif
> -    cpu->cfg.epmp = true;
> +    cpu->cfg.ext_smepmp = true;
>  }
>
>  static void rv32_imafcu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> @@ -1198,12 +1199,12 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>          }
>      }
>
> -    if (cpu->cfg.epmp && !cpu->cfg.pmp) {
> +    if (cpu->cfg.ext_smepmp && !cpu->cfg.pmp) {
>          /*
>           * Enhanced PMP should only be available
>           * on harts with PMP support
>           */
> -        error_setg(errp, "Invalid configuration: EPMP requires PMP support");
> +        error_setg(errp, "Invalid configuration: Smepmp requires PMP 
> support");
>          return;
>      }
>
> @@ -1560,7 +1561,7 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zcmt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcmt, false),
>
>      /* ePMP 0.9.3 */

Can you remove this comment?

Alistair

> -    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-epmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.epmp, false),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("smepmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_smepmp, false),
>      DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-smaia", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_smaia, false),
>      DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-ssaia", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_ssaia, false),
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> index de7e43126a..9b4b012896 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {
>      bool ext_zvfh;
>      bool ext_zvfhmin;
>      bool ext_smaia;
> +    bool ext_smepmp;
>      bool ext_ssaia;
>      bool ext_sscofpmf;
>      bool rvv_ta_all_1s;
> @@ -468,7 +469,6 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {
>      uint16_t cboz_blocksize;
>      bool mmu;
>      bool pmp;
> -    bool epmp;
>      bool debug;
>      bool misa_w;
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
> index 4451bd1263..d9ecc222e7 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/csr.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
> @@ -519,9 +519,9 @@ static RISCVException pmp(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
>      return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
>  }
>
> -static RISCVException epmp(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
> +static RISCVException smepmp(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
>  {
> -    if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->epmp) {
> +    if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smepmp) {
>          return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
>      }
>
> @@ -4337,7 +4337,7 @@ riscv_csr_operations csr_ops[CSR_TABLE_SIZE] = {
>      [CSR_VSIPH]       = { "vsiph",       aia_hmode32, NULL, NULL, rmw_vsiph 
> },
>
>      /* Physical Memory Protection */
> -    [CSR_MSECCFG]    = { "mseccfg",  epmp, read_mseccfg, write_mseccfg,
> +    [CSR_MSECCFG]    = { "mseccfg", smepmp, read_mseccfg, write_mseccfg,
>                           .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0           },
>      [CSR_PMPCFG0]    = { "pmpcfg0",   pmp, read_pmpcfg,  write_pmpcfg  },
>      [CSR_PMPCFG1]    = { "pmpcfg1",   pmp, read_pmpcfg,  write_pmpcfg  },
> diff --git a/target/riscv/pmp.c b/target/riscv/pmp.c
> index 1f5aca42e8..f498e414f0 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/pmp.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/pmp.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void pmp_write_cfg(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t 
> pmp_index, uint8_t val)
>      if (pmp_index < MAX_RISCV_PMPS) {
>          bool locked = true;
>
> -        if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->epmp) {
> +        if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smepmp) {
>              /* mseccfg.RLB is set */
>              if (MSECCFG_RLB_ISSET(env)) {
>                  locked = false;
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static bool pmp_hart_has_privs_default(CPURISCVState 
> *env, target_ulong addr,
>  {
>      bool ret;
>
> -    if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->epmp) {
> +    if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smepmp) {
>          if (MSECCFG_MMWP_ISSET(env)) {
>              /*
>               * The Machine Mode Whitelist Policy (mseccfg.MMWP) is set
> @@ -354,9 +354,9 @@ int pmp_hart_has_privs(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong 
> addr,
>
>          /*
>           * Convert the PMP permissions to match the truth table in the
> -         * ePMP spec.
> +         * Smepmp spec.
>           */
> -        const uint8_t epmp_operation =
> +        const uint8_t smepmp_operation =
>              ((env->pmp_state.pmp[i].cfg_reg & PMP_LOCK) >> 4) |
>              ((env->pmp_state.pmp[i].cfg_reg & PMP_READ) << 2) |
>              (env->pmp_state.pmp[i].cfg_reg & PMP_WRITE) |
> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ int pmp_hart_has_privs(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong 
> addr,
>                   * If mseccfg.MML Bit set, do the enhanced pmp priv check
>                   */
>                  if (mode == PRV_M) {
> -                    switch (epmp_operation) {
> +                    switch (smepmp_operation) {
>                      case 0:
>                      case 1:
>                      case 4:
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ int pmp_hart_has_privs(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong 
> addr,
>                          g_assert_not_reached();
>                      }
>                  } else {
> -                    switch (epmp_operation) {
> +                    switch (smepmp_operation) {
>                      case 0:
>                      case 8:
>                      case 9:
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]