qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] target/riscv: add zihpm extension flag for TCG


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] target/riscv: add zihpm extension flag for TCG
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:12:38 +1000

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 1:40 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> zihpm is the Hardware Performance Counters extension described in
> chapter 12 of the unprivileged spec. It describes support for 29
> unprivileged performance counters, hpmcounter3-hpmcounter31.
>
> As with zicntr, QEMU already implements zihpm before it was even an
> extension. zihpm is also part of the RVA22 profile, so add it to QEMU
> to complement the future profile implementation. Default it to 'true'
> for all existing CPUs since it was always present in the code.
>
> As for disabling it, there is already code in place in
> target/riscv/csr.c in all predicates for these counters (ctr() and
> mctr()) that disables them if cpu->cfg.pmu_num is zero. Thus, setting
> cpu->cfg.pmu_num to zero if 'zihpm=false' is enough to disable the
> extension.
>
> Set cpu->pmu_avail_ctrs mask to zero as well since this is also checked
> to verify if the counters exist.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c         |  3 +++
>  target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h     |  1 +
>  target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 69d64ec4ca..f40da4c661 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zifencei, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0, ext_zifencei),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zihintntl, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0, ext_zihintntl),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zihintpause, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0, ext_zihintpause),
> +    ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zihpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zihpm),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zmmul, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zmmul),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zawrs, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zawrs),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zfa, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zfa),
> @@ -1218,6 +1219,7 @@ static void riscv_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>       * users disable them.
>       */
>      RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.ext_zicntr = true;
> +    RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.ext_zihpm = true;
>  }
>
>  typedef struct misa_ext_info {
> @@ -1308,6 +1310,7 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
>      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("svpbmt", ext_svpbmt, false),
>
>      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zicntr", ext_zicntr, true),
> +    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zihpm", ext_zihpm, true),
>
>      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zba", ext_zba, true),
>      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zbb", ext_zbb, true),
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> index 73fd4b3231..6eef4a51ea 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {
>      bool ext_zicond;
>      bool ext_zihintntl;
>      bool ext_zihintpause;
> +    bool ext_zihpm;
>      bool ext_smstateen;
>      bool ext_sstc;
>      bool ext_svadu;
> diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> index a1e4ed2e24..093bda2e75 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> @@ -549,6 +549,19 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, 
> Error **errp)
>          cpu->cfg.ext_zicntr = false;
>      }
>
> +    if (cpu->cfg.ext_zihpm && !cpu->cfg.ext_zicsr) {
> +        if (cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zihpm))) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "zihpm requires zicsr");
> +            return;
> +        }
> +        cpu->cfg.ext_zihpm = false;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (!cpu->cfg.ext_zihpm) {
> +        cpu->cfg.pmu_num = 0;
> +        cpu->pmu_avail_ctrs = 0;
> +    }
> +
>      /*
>       * Disable isa extensions based on priv spec after we
>       * validated and set everything we need.
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]