KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR() and KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR() use an 'int ret' variable
that is used to do an early 'return' if ret > 0. Both are being called
in functions that are also declaring a 'ret' integer, initialized with
'0', and this integer is used as return of the function.
The result is that the compiler is less than pleased and is pointing
shadowing errors:
../target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr':
../target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c:90:13: error: declaration of 'ret' shadows a
previous local [-Werror=shadow=compatible-local]
90 | int ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, csr), ®); \
| ^~~
../target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c:539:5: note: in expansion of macro
'KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR'
539 | KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sstatus, env->mstatus);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c:536:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
536 | int ret = 0;
The macros are doing early returns for non-zero returns and the local
'ret' variable for both functions is used just to do 'return 0', so
remove them from kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr() and kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr()
and do a straight 'return 0' in the end.
For good measure let's also rename the 'ret' variables in
KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR() and KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR() to '_ret' to make them more
resilient to these kind of errors.
Fixes: 937f0b4512 ("target/riscv: Implement kvm_arch_get_registers")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)