qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] target/riscv: Enable updates for pointer masking vari


From: Alexey Baturo
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] target/riscv: Enable updates for pointer masking variables and thus enable pointer masking extension
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:23:23 +0300

I might be wrong here, but right now J in MISA is unused.
I think the J-letter extension is still a thing, but current extensions like Zjpm and Zjid follow the Z ext scheme.
Do you think it should be removed?


пт, 5 янв. 2024 г. в 08:28, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>:
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:58 AM Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Baturo <baturo.alexey@gmail.com>
> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 1e6571ce99..13389ddc55 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = {
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svinval, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svinval),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svnapot, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svnapot),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt),
> +    ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(ssnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_ssnpm),
> +    ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smnpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smnpm),
> +    ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smmpm, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smmpm),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadba, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadba),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbb, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbb),
>      ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xtheadbs, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0, ext_xtheadbs),
> @@ -1337,6 +1340,11 @@ const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
>
>      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false),
>
> +    /* Zjpm v0.8 extensions */
> +    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("ssnpm", ext_ssnpm, false),
> +    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smnpm", ext_smnpm, false),
> +    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smmpm", ext_smmpm, false),

What happens to the existing J property?


Alistair

> +
>      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false),
>      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false),
>      MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false),
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]