qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] riscv: named features riscv,isa, 'svade' rework


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] riscv: named features riscv,isa, 'svade' rework
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:52:30 +1000

On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 1:23 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In this new version we changed patch 3 as suggested by Alistair in v1
> [1]. Instead of creating individual always-true bool for each named
> feature, create a bool flag will be always 'true' to be used as config
> offset for these named extensions.
>
> Patches based on riscv-to-apply.next.
>
> Patches missing acks: patch 3.
>
> Changes from v2:
> - patch 3:
>   - 'ext_always_enabled' bool added
>   - individual always-enabled named features bools removed
> - v2 link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20240126133101.61344-8-ajones@ventanamicro.com/
>
>
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20240125195319.329181-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com/
>
> Andrew Jones (3):
>   target/riscv: Reset henvcfg to zero
>   target/riscv: Gate hardware A/D PTE bit updating
>   target/riscv: Promote svade to a normal extension
>
> Daniel Henrique Barboza (3):
>   target/riscv/tcg: set 'mmu' with 'satp' in cpu_set_profile()
>   target/riscv: add riscv,isa to named features
>   target/riscv: add remaining named features

Do you mind rebasing? I feel bad always asking, but I think it's your
patches that cause the conflicts :P

Alistair

>
>  target/riscv/cpu.c         | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h     | 12 +++++--
>  target/riscv/cpu_helper.c  | 19 ++++++++---
>  target/riscv/csr.c         |  2 +-
>  target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 34 +++++++++---------
>  5 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]