qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RFC 6/8] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configurati


From: JeeHeng Sia
Subject: RE: [RFC 6/8] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:45:51 +0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 5:25 PM
> To: Daniel P . Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>; Eduardo Habkost 
> <eduardo@habkost.net>; Marcel Apfelbaum
> <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>; Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>; 
> Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>;
> Michael S . Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>; Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>; 
> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>;
> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>; Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>; 
> Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>; Alex Bennée
> <alex.bennee@linaro.org>; Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>; Jonathan 
> Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>;
> JeeHeng Sia <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; qemu-riscv@nongnu.org; 
> qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Zhenyu Wang
> <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>; Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>; Yongwei Ma 
> <yongwei.ma@intel.com>; Zhao Liu
> <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> Subject: [RFC 6/8] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's 
> configuration
> 
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> 
> User will configure SMP cache topology via -smp.
> 
> For this case, update the x86 CPUs' cache topology with user's
> configuration in MachineState.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  target/i386/cpu.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index d7cb0f1e49b4..4b5c551fe7f0 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -7582,6 +7582,27 @@ static void x86_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
> 
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>      MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> +
> +    if (ms->smp_cache.l1d != CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID) {
> +        env->cache_info_cpuid4.l1d_cache->share_level = ms->smp_cache.l1d;
> +        env->cache_info_amd.l1d_cache->share_level = ms->smp_cache.l1d;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (ms->smp_cache.l1i != CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID) {
> +        env->cache_info_cpuid4.l1i_cache->share_level = ms->smp_cache.l1i;
> +        env->cache_info_amd.l1i_cache->share_level = ms->smp_cache.l1i;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (ms->smp_cache.l2 != CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID) {
> +        env->cache_info_cpuid4.l2_cache->share_level = ms->smp_cache.l2;
> +        env->cache_info_amd.l2_cache->share_level = ms->smp_cache.l2;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (ms->smp_cache.l3 != CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID) {
> +        env->cache_info_cpuid4.l3_cache->share_level = ms->smp_cache.l3;
> +        env->cache_info_amd.l3_cache->share_level = ms->smp_cache.l3;
> +    }
> +
I think this block of code can be further optimized. Maybe we can create
a function called updateCacheShareLevel() that takes a cache pointer and
a share level as arguments. This function encapsulates the common
pattern of updating cache share levels for different caches. You can define
it like this:
void updateCacheShareLevel(XxxCacheInfo *cache, int shareLevel) {
    if (shareLevel != CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID) {
        cache->share_level = shareLevel;
    }
}
>      qemu_register_reset(x86_cpu_machine_reset_cb, cpu);
> 
>      if (cpu->env.features[FEAT_1_EDX] & CPUID_APIC || ms->smp.cpus > 1) {
> --
> 2.34.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]