qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RISC-V][tech-server-soc] [RFC 2/2] target/riscv: Add server platfor


From: Wu, Fei
Subject: Re: [RISC-V][tech-server-soc] [RFC 2/2] target/riscv: Add server platform reference cpu
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:26:25 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 3/5/2024 1:58 PM, Wu, Fei wrote:
> On 3/5/2024 3:43 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/4/24 07:25, Fei Wu wrote:
>>> The harts requirements of RISC-V server platform [1] require RVA23 ISA
>>> profile support, plus Sv48, Svadu, H, Sscofmpf etc. This patch provides
>>> a virt CPU type (rvsp-ref) as compliant as possible.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-server-platform/blob/main/server_platform_requirements.adoc
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fei Wu <fei2.wu@intel.com>
>>> --->   hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c |  6 +++-
>>>   target/riscv/cpu-qom.h         |  1 +
>>>   target/riscv/cpu.c             | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
>>> b/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
>>> index ae90c4b27a..52ec607cee 100644
>>> --- a/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
>>> +++ b/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
>>> @@ -1205,11 +1205,15 @@ static void
>>> rvsp_ref_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>>>   {
>>>       char str[128];
>>>       MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
>>> +    static const char * const valid_cpu_types[] = {
>>> +        TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF,
>>> +    };
>>>         mc->desc = "RISC-V Server SoC Reference board";
>>>       mc->init = rvsp_ref_machine_init;
>>>       mc->max_cpus = RVSP_CPUS_MAX;
>>> -    mc->default_cpu_type = TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE;
>>> +    mc->default_cpu_type = TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF;
>>> +    mc->valid_cpu_types = valid_cpu_types;
>>
>> I suggest introducing this patch first, then the new machine type that
>> will use it as a default
>> CPU. The reason is to facilitate future bisects. If we introduce the
>> board first, a future bisect
>> might hit the previous patch, the board will be run using RV64 instead
>> of the correct CPU, and
>> we'll have different results because of it.
>>
> Good suggestion.
> 
>>>       mc->pci_allow_0_address = true;
>>>       mc->default_nic = "e1000e";
>>>       mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids = riscv_numa_possible_cpu_arch_ids;
>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h b/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
>>> index 3670cfe6d9..adb934d19e 100644
>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
>>> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
>>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54      
>>> RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("sifive-u54")
>>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C906      
>>> RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("thead-c906")
>>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_VEYRON_V1       
>>> RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("veyron-v1")
>>> +#define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF         RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rvsp-ref")
>>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_HOST             RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("host")
>>>     OBJECT_DECLARE_CPU_TYPE(RISCVCPU, RISCVCPUClass, RISCV_CPU)
>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>>> index 5ff0192c52..bc91be702b 100644
>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>>> @@ -2282,6 +2282,67 @@ static void rva22s64_profile_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>>>         RVA22S64.enabled = true;
>>>   }
>>> +
>>> +static void rv64_rvsp_ref_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>>> +{
>>> +    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
>>> +    RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(obj);
>>> +
>>> +    riscv_cpu_set_misa_ext(env, RVG | RVC | RVS | RVU | RVH | RVV);
>>> +
>>> +    /* FIXME: change to 1.13 */
>>> +    env->priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0;
>>> +
>>> +    /* RVA22U64 */
>>> +    cpu->cfg.mmu = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zifencei = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicsr = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicntr = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zihpm = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zihintpause = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zba = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zbb = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zbs = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.zic64b = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicbom = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicbop = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicboz = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.cbom_blocksize = 64;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.cbop_blocksize = 64;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.cboz_blocksize = 64;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zfhmin = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zkt = true;
>>
>> You can change this whole block with:
>>
>> RVA22U64.enabled = true;
>>
>>
>> riscv_cpu_add_profiles() will check if we have a profile enabled and, if
>> that's the
>> case, we'll enable all its extensions in the CPU.
>>
>> In the near future, when we implement a proper RVA23 support, we'll be
>> able to just do
>> a single RVA23S64.enabled = true in this cpu_init(). But for now we can
>> at least declare
>> RVA22U64 (perhaps RVA22S64) support for this CPU.
>>

Hi Daniel,

I'm not sure if it's a regression or the usage has been changed. I'm not
able to use '-cpu rva22s64' on latest qemu (db596ae190).

-- latest qemu, cannot see linux boot message and blocked

$Q -machine virt -nographic -m 2G -smp 2 \
  -cpu rva22s64 \
  -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf \
  -kernel $Kernel

Boot HART ID              : 1
Boot HART Domain          : root
Boot HART Priv Version    : v1.12
Boot HART Base ISA        : rv64imafdc
Boot HART ISA Extensions  : time
Boot HART PMP Count       : 0
Boot HART PMP Granularity : 0
Boot HART PMP Address Bits: 0
Boot HART MHPM Count      : 16
Boot HART MIDELEG         : 0x0000000000000222
Boot HART MEDELEG         : 0x000000000000b109

-- latest qemu, w/o rva22s64, looks good

$Q -machine virt -nographic -m 2G -smp 2 \
  -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf \
  -kernel $Kernel

Boot HART ID              : 0
Boot HART Domain          : root
Boot HART Priv Version    : v1.12
Boot HART Base ISA        : rv64imafdch
Boot HART ISA Extensions  : time,sstc
Boot HART PMP Count       : 16
Boot HART PMP Granularity : 4
Boot HART PMP Address Bits: 54
Boot HART MHPM Count      : 16
Boot HART MIDELEG         : 0x0000000000001666
Boot HART MEDELEG         : 0x0000000000f0b509
[    0.000000] Linux version 6.8.0-rc6+ (box@riscv-sw-lvm-1)
(riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04) 9.4.0, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #17 SMP Wed Feb 28 08:38:42 UTC 2024

-- commit dfa3c4c57, patch to enable rva22s64, looks good

$Q -machine virt -nographic -m 2G -smp 2 \
  -cpu rva22s64 \
  -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf \
  -kernel $Kernel

Boot HART ID              : 0
Boot HART Domain          : root
Boot HART Priv Version    : v1.12
Boot HART Base ISA        : rv64imafdc
Boot HART ISA Extensions  : time
Boot HART PMP Count       : 16
Boot HART PMP Granularity : 4
Boot HART PMP Address Bits: 54
Boot HART MHPM Count      : 16
Boot HART MIDELEG         : 0x0000000000000222
Boot HART MEDELEG         : 0x000000000000b109
[    0.000000] Linux version 6.8.0-rc6+ (box@riscv-sw-lvm-1)
(riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04) 9.4.0, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #17 SMP Wed Feb 28 08:38:42 UTC 2024

Thanks,
Fei

> Let me try.
> 
> Thanks,
> Fei.
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> +    /* RVA23U64 */
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zvfhmin = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zvbb = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zvkt = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zihintntl = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicond = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zcb = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zfa = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zawrs = true;
>>> +
>>> +    /* RVA23S64 */
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zifencei = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.svade = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_svpbmt = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_svinval = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_svnapot = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_sstc = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_sscofpmf = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen = true;
>>> +
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_smaia = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_ssaia = true;
>>> +
>>> +    /* Server Platform */
>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>>> +    set_satp_mode_max_supported(cpu, VM_1_10_SV48);
>>> +#endif
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_svadu = true;
>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zkr = true;
>>> +}
>>>   #endif
>>>     static const gchar *riscv_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs)
>>> @@ -2547,6 +2608,7 @@ static const TypeInfo riscv_cpu_type_infos[] = {
>>>       DEFINE_BARE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RV64E,        MXL_RV64, 
>>> rv64e_bare_cpu_init),
>>>       DEFINE_PROFILE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVA22U64,  MXL_RV64, 
>>> rva22u64_profile_cpu_init),
>>>       DEFINE_PROFILE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVA22S64,  MXL_RV64, 
>>> rva22s64_profile_cpu_init),
>>> +    DEFINE_VENDOR_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF,   MXL_RV64, 
>>> rv64_rvsp_ref_cpu_init),
>>>   #endif
>>>   };
>>>   
>>
>>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>> View/Reply Online (#125):
>> https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-server-soc/message/125
>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.riscv.org/mt/104719379/7152971
>> Group Owner: tech-server-soc+owner@lists.riscv.org
>> Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-server-soc/leave/12737993/7152971/1793629631/xyzzy
>>  [fei2.wu@intel.com]
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>>
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]