qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RISC-V][tech-server-soc] [RFC 2/2] target/riscv: Add server platfor


From: Wu, Fei
Subject: Re: [RISC-V][tech-server-soc] [RFC 2/2] target/riscv: Add server platform reference cpu
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:36:36 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 3/6/2024 9:26 PM, Wu, Fei wrote:
> On 3/5/2024 1:58 PM, Wu, Fei wrote:
>> On 3/5/2024 3:43 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/4/24 07:25, Fei Wu wrote:
>>>> The harts requirements of RISC-V server platform [1] require RVA23 ISA
>>>> profile support, plus Sv48, Svadu, H, Sscofmpf etc. This patch provides
>>>> a virt CPU type (rvsp-ref) as compliant as possible.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-server-platform/blob/main/server_platform_requirements.adoc
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fei Wu <fei2.wu@intel.com>
>>>> --->   hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c |  6 +++-
>>>>   target/riscv/cpu-qom.h         |  1 +
>>>>   target/riscv/cpu.c             | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
>>>> b/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
>>>> index ae90c4b27a..52ec607cee 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
>>>> @@ -1205,11 +1205,15 @@ static void
>>>> rvsp_ref_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>>>>   {
>>>>       char str[128];
>>>>       MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
>>>> +    static const char * const valid_cpu_types[] = {
>>>> +        TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF,
>>>> +    };
>>>>         mc->desc = "RISC-V Server SoC Reference board";
>>>>       mc->init = rvsp_ref_machine_init;
>>>>       mc->max_cpus = RVSP_CPUS_MAX;
>>>> -    mc->default_cpu_type = TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE;
>>>> +    mc->default_cpu_type = TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF;
>>>> +    mc->valid_cpu_types = valid_cpu_types;
>>>
>>> I suggest introducing this patch first, then the new machine type that
>>> will use it as a default
>>> CPU. The reason is to facilitate future bisects. If we introduce the
>>> board first, a future bisect
>>> might hit the previous patch, the board will be run using RV64 instead
>>> of the correct CPU, and
>>> we'll have different results because of it.
>>>
>> Good suggestion.
>>
>>>>       mc->pci_allow_0_address = true;
>>>>       mc->default_nic = "e1000e";
>>>>       mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids = riscv_numa_possible_cpu_arch_ids;
>>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h b/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
>>>> index 3670cfe6d9..adb934d19e 100644
>>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
>>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
>>>> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
>>>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54      
>>>> RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("sifive-u54")
>>>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C906      
>>>> RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("thead-c906")
>>>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_VEYRON_V1       
>>>> RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("veyron-v1")
>>>> +#define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF         RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rvsp-ref")
>>>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_HOST             RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("host")
>>>>     OBJECT_DECLARE_CPU_TYPE(RISCVCPU, RISCVCPUClass, RISCV_CPU)
>>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>>>> index 5ff0192c52..bc91be702b 100644
>>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
>>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>>>> @@ -2282,6 +2282,67 @@ static void rva22s64_profile_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>>>>         RVA22S64.enabled = true;
>>>>   }
>>>> +
>>>> +static void rv64_rvsp_ref_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
>>>> +    RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(obj);
>>>> +
>>>> +    riscv_cpu_set_misa_ext(env, RVG | RVC | RVS | RVU | RVH | RVV);
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* FIXME: change to 1.13 */
>>>> +    env->priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0;
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* RVA22U64 */
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.mmu = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zifencei = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicsr = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicntr = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zihpm = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zihintpause = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zba = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zbb = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zbs = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.zic64b = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicbom = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicbop = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicboz = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.cbom_blocksize = 64;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.cbop_blocksize = 64;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.cboz_blocksize = 64;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zfhmin = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zkt = true;
>>>
>>> You can change this whole block with:
>>>
>>> RVA22U64.enabled = true;
>>>
>>>
>>> riscv_cpu_add_profiles() will check if we have a profile enabled and, if
>>> that's the
>>> case, we'll enable all its extensions in the CPU.
>>>
>>> In the near future, when we implement a proper RVA23 support, we'll be
>>> able to just do
>>> a single RVA23S64.enabled = true in this cpu_init(). But for now we can
>>> at least declare
>>> RVA22U64 (perhaps RVA22S64) support for this CPU.
>>>
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I'm not sure if it's a regression or the usage has been changed. I'm not
> able to use '-cpu rva22s64' on latest qemu (db596ae190).
> 
I did a quick git bisect and found that commit d06f28db6 "target/riscv:
move 'mmu' to riscv_cpu_properties[]" disabled mmu by default, so that
an explicit mmu option should be added to qemu command line like '-cpu
rva22s64,mmu=true', I think rva22s64 should enable it by default.

Thanks,
Fei.

> -- latest qemu, cannot see linux boot message and blocked
> 
> $Q -machine virt -nographic -m 2G -smp 2 \
>   -cpu rva22s64 \
>   -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf \
>   -kernel $Kernel
> 
> Boot HART ID              : 1
> Boot HART Domain          : root
> Boot HART Priv Version    : v1.12
> Boot HART Base ISA        : rv64imafdc
> Boot HART ISA Extensions  : time
> Boot HART PMP Count       : 0
> Boot HART PMP Granularity : 0
> Boot HART PMP Address Bits: 0
> Boot HART MHPM Count      : 16
> Boot HART MIDELEG         : 0x0000000000000222
> Boot HART MEDELEG         : 0x000000000000b109
> 
> -- latest qemu, w/o rva22s64, looks good
> 
> $Q -machine virt -nographic -m 2G -smp 2 \
>   -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf \
>   -kernel $Kernel
> 
> Boot HART ID              : 0
> Boot HART Domain          : root
> Boot HART Priv Version    : v1.12
> Boot HART Base ISA        : rv64imafdch
> Boot HART ISA Extensions  : time,sstc
> Boot HART PMP Count       : 16
> Boot HART PMP Granularity : 4
> Boot HART PMP Address Bits: 54
> Boot HART MHPM Count      : 16
> Boot HART MIDELEG         : 0x0000000000001666
> Boot HART MEDELEG         : 0x0000000000f0b509
> [    0.000000] Linux version 6.8.0-rc6+ (box@riscv-sw-lvm-1)
> (riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04) 9.4.0, GNU ld (GNU
> Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #17 SMP Wed Feb 28 08:38:42 UTC 2024
> 
> -- commit dfa3c4c57, patch to enable rva22s64, looks good
> 
> $Q -machine virt -nographic -m 2G -smp 2 \
>   -cpu rva22s64 \
>   -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf \
>   -kernel $Kernel
> 
> Boot HART ID              : 0
> Boot HART Domain          : root
> Boot HART Priv Version    : v1.12
> Boot HART Base ISA        : rv64imafdc
> Boot HART ISA Extensions  : time
> Boot HART PMP Count       : 16
> Boot HART PMP Granularity : 4
> Boot HART PMP Address Bits: 54
> Boot HART MHPM Count      : 16
> Boot HART MIDELEG         : 0x0000000000000222
> Boot HART MEDELEG         : 0x000000000000b109
> [    0.000000] Linux version 6.8.0-rc6+ (box@riscv-sw-lvm-1)
> (riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04) 9.4.0, GNU ld (GNU
> Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #17 SMP Wed Feb 28 08:38:42 UTC 2024
> 
> Thanks,
> Fei
> 
>> Let me try.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fei.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* RVA23U64 */
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zvfhmin = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zvbb = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zvkt = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zihintntl = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zicond = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zcb = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zfa = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zawrs = true;
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* RVA23S64 */
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zifencei = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.svade = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_svpbmt = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_svinval = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_svnapot = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_sstc = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_sscofpmf = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen = true;
>>>> +
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_smaia = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_ssaia = true;
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* Server Platform */
>>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>>>> +    set_satp_mode_max_supported(cpu, VM_1_10_SV48);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_svadu = true;
>>>> +    cpu->cfg.ext_zkr = true;
>>>> +}
>>>>   #endif
>>>>     static const gchar *riscv_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs)
>>>> @@ -2547,6 +2608,7 @@ static const TypeInfo riscv_cpu_type_infos[] = {
>>>>       DEFINE_BARE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RV64E,        MXL_RV64, 
>>>> rv64e_bare_cpu_init),
>>>>       DEFINE_PROFILE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVA22U64,  MXL_RV64, 
>>>> rva22u64_profile_cpu_init),
>>>>       DEFINE_PROFILE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVA22S64,  MXL_RV64, 
>>>> rva22s64_profile_cpu_init),
>>>> +    DEFINE_VENDOR_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF,   MXL_RV64, 
>>>> rv64_rvsp_ref_cpu_init),
>>>>   #endif
>>>>   };
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>>> View/Reply Online (#125):
>>> https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-server-soc/message/125
>>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.riscv.org/mt/104719379/7152971
>>> Group Owner: tech-server-soc+owner@lists.riscv.org
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-server-soc/leave/12737993/7152971/1793629631/xyzzy
>>>  [fei2.wu@intel.com]
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>
>>>
>>
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]