qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RISC-V][tech-server-soc] [RFC 2/2] target/riscv: Add server platfor


From: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Subject: Re: [RISC-V][tech-server-soc] [RFC 2/2] target/riscv: Add server platform reference cpu
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 16:15:30 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird



On 3/7/24 04:36, Wu, Fei wrote:
On 3/6/2024 9:26 PM, Wu, Fei wrote:
On 3/5/2024 1:58 PM, Wu, Fei wrote:
On 3/5/2024 3:43 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:


On 3/4/24 07:25, Fei Wu wrote:
The harts requirements of RISC-V server platform [1] require RVA23 ISA
profile support, plus Sv48, Svadu, H, Sscofmpf etc. This patch provides
a virt CPU type (rvsp-ref) as compliant as possible.

[1]
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-server-platform/blob/main/server_platform_requirements.adoc

Signed-off-by: Fei Wu <fei2.wu@intel.com>
--->   hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c |  6 +++-
   target/riscv/cpu-qom.h         |  1 +
   target/riscv/cpu.c             | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
b/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
index ae90c4b27a..52ec607cee 100644
--- a/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
+++ b/hw/riscv/server_platform_ref.c
@@ -1205,11 +1205,15 @@ static void
rvsp_ref_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
   {
       char str[128];
       MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
+    static const char * const valid_cpu_types[] = {
+        TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF,
+    };
         mc->desc = "RISC-V Server SoC Reference board";
       mc->init = rvsp_ref_machine_init;
       mc->max_cpus = RVSP_CPUS_MAX;
-    mc->default_cpu_type = TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE;
+    mc->default_cpu_type = TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF;
+    mc->valid_cpu_types = valid_cpu_types;

I suggest introducing this patch first, then the new machine type that
will use it as a default
CPU. The reason is to facilitate future bisects. If we introduce the
board first, a future bisect
might hit the previous patch, the board will be run using RV64 instead
of the correct CPU, and
we'll have different results because of it.

Good suggestion.

       mc->pci_allow_0_address = true;
       mc->default_nic = "e1000e";
       mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids = riscv_numa_possible_cpu_arch_ids;
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h b/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
index 3670cfe6d9..adb934d19e 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54
RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("sifive-u54")
   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C906
RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("thead-c906")
   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_VEYRON_V1
RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("veyron-v1")
+#define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF         RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rvsp-ref")
   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_HOST             RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("host")
     OBJECT_DECLARE_CPU_TYPE(RISCVCPU, RISCVCPUClass, RISCV_CPU)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 5ff0192c52..bc91be702b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -2282,6 +2282,67 @@ static void rva22s64_profile_cpu_init(Object *obj)
         RVA22S64.enabled = true;
   }
+
+static void rv64_rvsp_ref_cpu_init(Object *obj)
+{
+    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
+    RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(obj);
+
+    riscv_cpu_set_misa_ext(env, RVG | RVC | RVS | RVU | RVH | RVV);
+
+    /* FIXME: change to 1.13 */
+    env->priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0;
+
+    /* RVA22U64 */
+    cpu->cfg.mmu = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zifencei = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zicsr = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zicntr = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zihpm = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zihintpause = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zba = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zbb = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zbs = true;
+    cpu->cfg.zic64b = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zicbom = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zicbop = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zicboz = true;
+    cpu->cfg.cbom_blocksize = 64;
+    cpu->cfg.cbop_blocksize = 64;
+    cpu->cfg.cboz_blocksize = 64;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zfhmin = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zkt = true;

You can change this whole block with:

RVA22U64.enabled = true;


riscv_cpu_add_profiles() will check if we have a profile enabled and, if
that's the
case, we'll enable all its extensions in the CPU.

In the near future, when we implement a proper RVA23 support, we'll be
able to just do
a single RVA23S64.enabled = true in this cpu_init(). But for now we can
at least declare
RVA22U64 (perhaps RVA22S64) support for this CPU.


Hi Daniel,

I'm not sure if it's a regression or the usage has been changed. I'm not
able to use '-cpu rva22s64' on latest qemu (db596ae190).

I did a quick git bisect and found that commit d06f28db6 "target/riscv:
move 'mmu' to riscv_cpu_properties[]" disabled mmu by default, so that
an explicit mmu option should be added to qemu command line like '-cpu
rva22s64,mmu=true', I think rva22s64 should enable it by default.


This is fixed in alistair/riscv-to-apply.next by this commit:

commit 5b8d66e6bf7904535ee277e9c70b332c4462f10a
Author: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 15 19:39:50 2024 -0300

    target/riscv/tcg: set 'mmu' with 'satp' in cpu_set_profile()
Recent changes in options handling removed the 'mmu' default the bare
    CPUs had, meaning that we must enable 'mmu' by hand when using the
    rva22s64 profile CPU.
Given that this profile is setting a satp mode, it already implies that
    we need a 'mmu'. Enable the 'mmu' in this case.



Thanks,

Daniel


Thanks,
Fei.

-- latest qemu, cannot see linux boot message and blocked

$Q -machine virt -nographic -m 2G -smp 2 \
   -cpu rva22s64 \
   -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf \
   -kernel $Kernel

Boot HART ID              : 1
Boot HART Domain          : root
Boot HART Priv Version    : v1.12
Boot HART Base ISA        : rv64imafdc
Boot HART ISA Extensions  : time
Boot HART PMP Count       : 0
Boot HART PMP Granularity : 0
Boot HART PMP Address Bits: 0
Boot HART MHPM Count      : 16
Boot HART MIDELEG         : 0x0000000000000222
Boot HART MEDELEG         : 0x000000000000b109

-- latest qemu, w/o rva22s64, looks good

$Q -machine virt -nographic -m 2G -smp 2 \
   -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf \
   -kernel $Kernel

Boot HART ID              : 0
Boot HART Domain          : root
Boot HART Priv Version    : v1.12
Boot HART Base ISA        : rv64imafdch
Boot HART ISA Extensions  : time,sstc
Boot HART PMP Count       : 16
Boot HART PMP Granularity : 4
Boot HART PMP Address Bits: 54
Boot HART MHPM Count      : 16
Boot HART MIDELEG         : 0x0000000000001666
Boot HART MEDELEG         : 0x0000000000f0b509
[    0.000000] Linux version 6.8.0-rc6+ (box@riscv-sw-lvm-1)
(riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04) 9.4.0, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #17 SMP Wed Feb 28 08:38:42 UTC 2024

-- commit dfa3c4c57, patch to enable rva22s64, looks good

$Q -machine virt -nographic -m 2G -smp 2 \
   -cpu rva22s64 \
   -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf \
   -kernel $Kernel

Boot HART ID              : 0
Boot HART Domain          : root
Boot HART Priv Version    : v1.12
Boot HART Base ISA        : rv64imafdc
Boot HART ISA Extensions  : time
Boot HART PMP Count       : 16
Boot HART PMP Granularity : 4
Boot HART PMP Address Bits: 54
Boot HART MHPM Count      : 16
Boot HART MIDELEG         : 0x0000000000000222
Boot HART MEDELEG         : 0x000000000000b109
[    0.000000] Linux version 6.8.0-rc6+ (box@riscv-sw-lvm-1)
(riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04) 9.4.0, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #17 SMP Wed Feb 28 08:38:42 UTC 2024

Thanks,
Fei

Let me try.

Thanks,
Fei.


Thanks,

Daniel


+
+    /* RVA23U64 */
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zvfhmin = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zvbb = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zvkt = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zihintntl = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zicond = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zcb = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zfa = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zawrs = true;
+
+    /* RVA23S64 */
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zifencei = true;
+    cpu->cfg.svade = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_svpbmt = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_svinval = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_svnapot = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_sstc = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_sscofpmf = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen = true;
+
+    cpu->cfg.ext_smaia = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_ssaia = true;
+
+    /* Server Platform */
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+    set_satp_mode_max_supported(cpu, VM_1_10_SV48);
+#endif
+    cpu->cfg.ext_svadu = true;
+    cpu->cfg.ext_zkr = true;
+}
   #endif
     static const gchar *riscv_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs)
@@ -2547,6 +2608,7 @@ static const TypeInfo riscv_cpu_type_infos[] = {
       DEFINE_BARE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RV64E,        MXL_RV64,
rv64e_bare_cpu_init),
       DEFINE_PROFILE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVA22U64,  MXL_RV64,
rva22u64_profile_cpu_init),
       DEFINE_PROFILE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVA22S64,  MXL_RV64,
rva22s64_profile_cpu_init),
+    DEFINE_VENDOR_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_RVSP_REF,   MXL_RV64,
rv64_rvsp_ref_cpu_init),
   #endif
   };


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#125):
https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-server-soc/message/125
Mute This Topic: https://lists.riscv.org/mt/104719379/7152971
Group Owner: tech-server-soc+owner@lists.riscv.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-server-soc/leave/12737993/7152971/1793629631/xyzzy
 [fei2.wu@intel.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]