[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xougen] FW: imake status in Xouvert
From: |
William Lahti |
Subject: |
Re: [xougen] FW: imake status in Xouvert |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:04:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
On Saturday 30 August 2003 6:27 am, address@hidden wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:49:24AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Could all of the various maintainers for different OSes get together to
> > rewrite XFree86's build to use autotools and be portable to the same
> > platforms? Probably. But I expect it'll require so many os-specific
> > hacks that it'll result in a mess that is slower to build and more
> > difficult to read than the existing, working imake build system.
>
> automake at all is nothing more as an collection hacks.
> it really sucks and produces more problems as it solves.
>
> So we need something completely new - designed from ground up for the
> problems of distributed development and strongly heterogenous environments.
>
> See my latest posting about that.
And you expect who to create this system?
>
> cu
--
William Lahti, aka xfury
$ /usr/games/fortune
Attorney General Edwin Meese III explained why the Supreme Court's Miranda
decision (holding that subjects have a right to remain silent and have a
lawyer present during questioning) is unnecessary: "You don't have many
suspects who are innocent of a crime. That's contradictory. If a person
is innocent of a crime, then he is not a suspect."
-- U.S. News and World Report, 10/14/85
$ uptime
20:04:25 up 1 day, 3:17, 2 users, load average: 0.18, 0.14, 0.10