gnu-arch-users archive search

41. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH and signed archives (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:29:38 +0100

Where can we get your public key? It doesn't appear on the keyservers. johannes -- http://www.sipsolutions.de/ GnuPG key: http://www.sipsolutions.de/keys/JohannesBerg.asc Key-ID: 9AB78CA5 Johannes Be

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-01/msg00301.html (6,321 bytes)

42. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH and signed archives (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:06:32 +0100

hi, i got 0.0.7 from your 2004s archive, and everything seems to work now. thanks for your help, and for a nice piece of software! cheers, jao -- Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-01/msg00299.html (6,141 bytes)

43. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH and signed archives (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:36:58 +0900 (JST)

Here it is. also available from http://arch.bluegate.org/publickey.txt - Tez - --BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) mQGiBD/+ZHIRBACnABbTl0DBb8EwWMu8MD1iLqS6yHhxOAB260yodpR

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-01/msg00297.html (7,559 bytes)

44. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] viewarch displays no archives (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:17:09 +0000

I'm using the very latest tla-1.2 (but that seems to have nothing to do with it). Doh! That was it :) My $HOME is world readable, so I didn't even bother checking for permissions. I should have, sinc

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-01/msg00068.html (5,198 bytes)

45. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.3 set python execuable (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 15:26:53 +0200

According to Tez Kamihira: The whole point of using env is to be able to omit the full path to a given binary so use either or -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- address@hidden D

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-10/msg00624.html (5,390 bytes)

46. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.3 (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 22:02:34 +0100

I'd love to second-pick. -- Paul

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-10/msg00354.html (5,599 bytes)

47. [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.3 (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: 04 Oct 2003 23:43:55 +0900

BTW, one small nitpick: when you click the `text' (downloadable text) button, it opens a new window, which I think it shouldn't do. [ViewCVS also has this behavior, but I think that's a problem with

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-10/msg00339.html (5,354 bytes)

48. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:46:27 +1000

According to duffy, the experimental branch isn't usable for totla just now... Real soon now though, I'm informed ;) Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>. A

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00736.html (8,961 bytes)

49. [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2 (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 04:16:00 -0400

It's not hard to track renames within a single branch given the information in the patch-logs (and patch-logs are easily available, both in the archive, and in a project tree). Indeed my script doesn

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00680.html (6,903 bytes)

50. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2 (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 16:45:38 +0900 (JST)

http://arch.bluegate.org/cgi-bin/viewarch.cgi/address@hidden/ViewArch--tez--0.0.2--patch-24 fixed, thanks! - Tez

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00678.html (6,767 bytes)

51. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:21:48 +0200

that's the one! -- Dr. Denys Duchier Équipe Calligramme LORIA, Nancy, FRANCE

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00649.html (8,373 bytes)

52. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:38:14 -0500

Tried it. cscvs cache -b appeared to work fine, but: address@hidden:~/cvs/linux-2.4$ cscvs totla -i 1 ~/tla/wc-bk-2.4 /home/jgoerzen/tla/wc-bk-2.4 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/jgoer

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00647.html (9,315 bytes)

53. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:41:50 +0200

no dice: cvs2arch: bad or unrecognized patchset format -- Denys Duchier - Équipe Calligramme - LORIA, Nancy, France

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00645.html (8,410 bytes)

54. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: 12 Sep 2003 08:25:03 -0700

You already know CVS and that's the way you would have done it anyway. I don't see any "loss" there. One possible way to do this is the other way around - through CVS, until the migration boundary is

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00643.html (9,538 bytes)

55. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:19:22 +0200

If you didn't split development in branches, or you accept to have imported in tla a single branch (the head one), cvs2arch might suffice. http://www.yuv.info/~wavexx/hacks/cvs2arch -- '(wave++ "Yuri

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00641.html (9,045 bytes)

56. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:09:58 +0200

Because I don't want to have to use 2 tools to access my project's history. I also want "annotate" support and I want it to be able to give me useful info for history that predates migration to arch.

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00640.html (8,803 bytes)

57. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: 12 Sep 2003 07:54:27 -0700

Yes. Forget about "importing" your CVS history into tla. I think it's a lost cause in general with little particular redeeming value. Why do you want to do that? The history is still there, and acces

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00639.html (9,617 bytes)

58. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:40:35 +0200

Maybe I was wrong. I have now had time to try the next step and it doesn't work: cscvs totla -i 1 /projects/ARCH/Work/address@hidden/mozart /projects/ARCH/Work/address@hidden/mozart Traceback (most r

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00638.html (8,996 bytes)

59. Re: [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:00:31 +0200

My own experience is: - original cscvs is not usable (too slow - I killed it after 3 days) - original cscvs + twisted support is much much much faster but eventually filled my partition and aborted -

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00635.html (9,222 bytes)

60. [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs *huge* memory usage [was: Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2] (score: 33)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:08:11 -0500

Tried this on the Linux kernel tree. It ran for awhile getting the logs, then: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 9382 jgoerzen 16 0 1928m 1.7g 1640 R 9.2 86.8 2:29.52 python Yes,

/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-09/msg00632.html (8,327 bytes)