[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans |
Date: |
16 Sep 2003 12:56:53 +0900 |
David Brown <address@hidden> writes:
> Opencm has an .opencm-rules file which can contain lines that state
> exclude re
> include re
Perhaps that sort of structure is better for the arch-specific
per-directory files (which I've been calling `.arch-ignore', but maybe
that name is not appropriate considering...); not exclude/include
specifically, but the more arch-style stuff from =tagging-methods:
junk RE
precious RE
...
the idea being that anything left `unrecognized' after being run through
the per-directory config file would then be passed on to the
project-global =tagging-method rules.
I'm not sure what the per-directory file should be called though;
something like `.arch-tagging-method' seems obvious, but as discussed
before on this list, I'd like to move away from using the term `tag' in
this context -- even though I've gotten very used to it, and it seems
natural to me, I still think it's a bad idea in general due to the
conflict with other RCSs. How about just `.arch-naming' or even
`.arch-config' and leave open the possibility to add other stuff to the
file later (hmmm, would per-directory tagging-methods work?!?).
BTW, it seems sometimes more convenient to write such regexps as
multiple entries, e.g.:
junk \.foo$
junk \.bar$
... and have them automatically concatenated into `\.foo$|\.bar$'; is
this currently supported in =tagging-method? Would it be feasible to
support it?
-Miles
--
Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Florian Weimer, 2003/09/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Colin Walters, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, David Brown, 2003/09/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Colin Walters, 2003/09/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/16